Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. Why is the medical history – the patient’s narrative – so critical? I have opined in this blog repeatedly that the medical history is paramount, much more valuable than the physical examination or the laboratory and other data. Of course, there are instances when a finding on the exam or abnormal data cracks the case, but in general, the patient’s own story is most significant most of the time. Indeed, medical professionals, if we are not being careful, can permit abnormal data results to lead us to a trap door which will take us far away from where we should be. Consider this to be a medical ‘wag the dog’ phenomenon. Our focus should be squarely on the patient ...
MD Whistleblower presents vignettes and commentaries on the medical profession. We peek 'behind the medical curtain' and deliver candor and controversy in every post.