Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. I have numerous posts within this blog cautioning against pursuing second medical opinions. This can be a tough argument to make as most patients believe that obtaining additional medical advice is all upside. What could go wrong? They argue that a second opinion either confirms the existing medical advice or provides new & improved recommendations. It's not that simple. If readers enter second opinion in the search function of this blog, you will find several posts that point out potential pitfalls of seeking medical advice from new doctors. It's not all upside. How do I regard my role when offering a second opinion? I generally regard my second opin...
Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. Patients regularly initiate inquiries starting with, ‘ could it be …’ This usually follows my opinion on their symptoms and the available diagnostic or therapeutic options. Patients have often conducted their own research, generally on the internet, or have received diagnostic advice from folks they know who have suffered similar symptoms. It’s perfectly natural, for example, if a patient’s roommate had his gallbladder removed for the same stomach issues, that the patient may believe that his gallbladder needs to be donated to science also. (Note to reader: just because the roommate underwent gallbladder removal doesn’t necessarily mean that this was the...