Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. In the olden days, physicians practiced in a paternalistic fashion, simply informing patients of the next steps to be taken. This anachronistic practice falls well beyond today’s professional boundaries, although several decades ago, this was the norm. And the public did not object. They came to their doctors for advice and, in general, they accepted the recommendations that were offered. Both sides of the relationship believed that the system was functioning well. There was no preoccupation with autonomy or with shared decision making, the process whereby physicians and patients today collaborate as they tease through various options. While I conform t...
Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. When a medical misadventure or new symptoms develop, physicians will often consider if the event is a side effect of a medication. This can be very difficult to establish. For example, if a patient is given medication to treat colitis and the diarrhea worsens, is this a side effect of the medicine or a worsening of the colitis? Physicians face these dilemmas all the time. If a patient develops a symptom, and a side effect is being considered as an explanation, the doctor either knows or researches if there is medical evidence supporting a side effect event in this specific circumstance. If a patient develops headaches after a new medicine is prescrib...