Skip to main content

Delivering bad news to patients.

Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox.

Life changes in an instant.  This truth becomes more self-evident as we age, although even the young may have to learn hard lessons before their time.  We may be comfortably coasting along in a carefree manner only to have a single phone call or a text shatter our equilibrium.  Certainly, every reader of these posts has had this experience. 

I am referring here to an unexpected change of fortune.  It’s quite a different scenario if one has time to prepare for a disruption, such as knowing that you will lose your job in 6 months.  In this example, there is time to prepare and to forge an alternative pathway so that when the current job ends, in a best-case scenario, there will be a seamless transition. 

But life can change abruptly, grabbing us aggressively from behind.  We in the medical profession witness this more than most.  Every medical professional has watched what was expected to be a routine medical event emerge instead as a complex and serious situation.  In these instances, the physician is generally the first to receive the information and then communicates it to the patient. When I have been this doctor, I have been aware of the surreal time interval in between my receiving the medical report and my sharing it with the patient.  On a fantasy level, I want to lengthen this interval to delay imparting unfavorable medical news, but this is of course a measure of magical thinking on my part.  Life can be messy.


Life can change with a phone call.
(Alexander Graham Bell opening a long-distance phone line in 1892.)


How physicians deliver such news is extremely important and can deeply impact patients and their families.  All of us have experienced or witnessed when this has been done well, and also when it could have been done better.  At times, the inclusion or the omission of a single word might distort a patient’s understanding of the situation.  Such a patient might end up being more hopeful or more fearful than the facts warrant.  Words matter.

Communication between physicians and patients is the scaffolding of doctor-patient relationships. Delivering bad news takes special skill and has higher stakes.  You would think that during my many years of education and training that I was schooled deeply in this discipline, but I wasn’t.  I learned what I know by reading and having watched senior physicians and role models in action and incorporating certain practices and styles into my own professional armamentarium.  Conversely, I’ve witnessed communication techniques that I have elected to set aside.  This is how we all grow over time; we accept and reject as we develop our own preferences and styles.

This is not a one-size-fits-all medical task, such as doing a colonoscopy, refilling a prescription or measuring blood pressure.  The physician who will be imparting serious news needs to adjust the strategy depending upon the specific medical circumstances and the particular patient involved.  Some patients, for instance, want more information than others. Some patients can absorb more information than others.  Having an established rapport with patients in these circumstances is invaluable, but is not always present.  We do the best that we can.

How well am I doing at this?  I’m still learning and I believe that I have improved over time, at least I hope so.  It will remain for me a perpetual work in progress.

Next week, I will share a dialogue between me and a patient demonstrating my style in doing this important work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...