Skip to main content

Should I Choose Cologuard Over Colonoscopy?

Cologuard has become a popular colon cancer screening option.  Indeed, it has many advantages over the traditional colonoscopy. Refer to the list below.

  • No prep!
  • No prep!
  • No time off of work.
  • No driver needed.
  • No procedural risk.
  • Done at home.
  • No driving or other restrictions afterwards.\
  • Much less expensive.
  • Did I mention there is no prep:?
Wow, Cologuard sounds like it will be hard to beat.  Not so fast!

Cologuard is a sophisticated stool DNA test that detects altered DNA as well as microscopic blood in the stool. Studies have shown that it detects over 90% of colon cancers.  Keep in mind that the overwhelming number of patients undergoing colonoscopy do not have cancer so that this statistic doesn’t apply to them.  How does this stool DNA test perform with respect to colon polyps, which are the target lesions during colonoscopy?  Cologuard detects only 42% of larger precancerous polyps which seems to me to be rather lackluster performance. Large colon polyps are at greater risk of transforming to cancer over time.  If you had one of them, would you opt for a screening test like Cologuard that had a 58% chance  missing it?  I doubt it.  "Hey mom, great news!  I got 42% on the math test!" 

While a 13% false positive rate for Cologuard has been published, based on my own experience and that of my colleagues, I believe this is an underestimate.



Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone National Park
After Drinking a Colonoscopy Prep.

Colonoscopy is far superior in terms of detecting polyps and has the singular advantage of being able to remove them during the procedure.  I am aware, of course, of the drawbacks of the colonoscopy experience, which are well known to readers of this blog.  But it is clearly the best available option to reduce colon cancer risk.  Ask your own doctor what screening test he or she has opted for, and I suspect most of them chose colonoscopy.

Is there a role for Cologuard?  Definitely.  While inferior to colonoscopy, it still offers a measure of protection.  To compensate for its lower effectiveness, the test is advised at 3 year intervals, much more often than screening colonoscopies are.  Also, I expect that ongoing research on stool DNA testing will yield much more effective products.  So stay tuned.

So patients, do you prefer difficult, inconvenient but very effective or easy and much less accurate?


Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...