MD Whistleblower

On a regular basis, physicians receive calls or communications from patients who want to schedule their own scope examinations of their colon or stomach regions.  These requests are solely from patients without any input from medical professionals.  A few days before writing this, a patient contacted our office to ask if we would perform an scope exam (EGD) of the esophagus and stomach regions at the same time as his previously scheduled colonoscopy to evaluate his cough.  This was his idea.  No physician or medical professional was involved. We summarily decline these requests.   If one of my own patients is making a scope exam request, I may acquiesce but only after having a dialog on the issue.   I do not extend this leniency to patients I do not know and aim for access onto my scope schedule. I believe that patients should not be permitted to order diagnostic tests and procedures.   While this may seem self-evident to readers, I surmise that ma...

Here’s a scenario that I face fairly regularly in my endoscopy and colonoscopy practice. As readers know, over the past 5 or so years I have been employed in a rather well-known Cleveland-based health care institution.  Prior to that, I was a private practitioner.  During those earlier days, I personally knew most of our scope clientele as they were our patients.  There was a minority of patients whom we did not know who were referred in by their doctors for routine scope exams.  In contrast, in my current employed role, nearly all the scope patients on my schedule are meeting me for the first time. From time to time, a patient who is scheduled for a colonoscopy will call my office asking if an upper endoscopy can be performed at the same time because their heartburn or some other symptom has been active. Which of the following responses are most appropriate? Yes we will gladly add on the extra scope test to assess your stomach and esophagus as this would be an o...

A recent article in Cleveland’s primary daily newspaper – which is still printed - discussed an intriguing issue.  An Ohio state representative has offered a bill that would require amusement parks to publicize online if any of their attractions are not running.  The bill is offered as a consumer protection measure to inform patrons of the status of park attractions before they travel distances and face pricey admission costs.  Folks will not be amused to arrive at an amusement park to discover that the ride that brought them there is out of order.  Do you think that a family who is notified at the ticket booth that the roller coaster of their dreams isn’t rolling will simply head back to the car head for home?  Imagine those happy kids in the back seat! “Hey kids, now we have time to go to the library and borrow some educational books!” We’ll see if this proposed bill becomes law.   Amusement park owners may push back on what they feel is government encr...

With some regularity, a patient will contact my office and demand a prompt call back. While the patient may be understandably preoccupied with the issue at hand, in most cases there is no medical urgency present.  I take my customer service responsibility seriously.  In fact, with rare exceptions, before the end of every work day, I or my staff have contacted every patient who has reached out to us.  The system works best when all parties are being reasonable and considerate.   Patients have told me over the years of rude treatment they have received from staff as well as medical professionals.   I believe that this does happen and it is inexcusable.   Medical professionals and staff must maintain decorum and high standards even when challenged.   When patients relate these anecdotes, I do not challenge them but I am aware that there may be competing versions of what transpired. Patients also have a responsibility to tend the doctor-patient relatio...

An important part of the human experience is the connections we forge and cultivate with others.  We all have our own universe populated with a cast of characters who play roles in our personal and professional lives.  You might recall the words of a rather well known playwright who began a monologue with, All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players… Familiarity breeds comfort.   Comfort creates satisfaction.   Change triggers anxiety. The three maxims above are not incontrovertible, but they are often true.   Indeed, we have all experienced them throughout our lives. As of this writing, my mother is 90-years-old.   She is managing reasonably well in her own apartment in New Jersey, in the same town where I was first raised over 60 years ago. During one of my recent visits to her, when she was of the tender age of 89, she prepared an amazing and unforgettable surprise for me.   She made me her special meatloaf, the same one ...

“I have a food allergy.” “I have a parasite.” “I have ‘leaky gut’.” “I have esophageal spasm.” These are examples of speculative diagnoses offered to me by patients.   It is natural in the era of the internet, with artificial intelligence (AI) looming, that patients will search for explanatory diagnoses for their symptoms. Who knows?    In time, and sooner than we think, AI’s performance may exceed that of human physicians, as well as other human endeavors.   At that time, AI may be preparing my weekly blog posts as it interferes and takes over the rest of my life. I won’t succumb willingly to this omnipresent and overpowering force, but I acknowledge that it will not be a fair fight. Most often, patient offered diagnoses are wrong, even though an internet search seems to have nailed the diagnosis precisely.   I have fever, fatigue, muscle aches, headaches and digestive issues.   Google let me straight to malaria!   How did my doctor miss thi...

Physicians, at least most of us, are not businessmen.  Yet, we are negotiators.  When I was in private practice, for instance, we were running an actual business.  There were negotiations with our landlord, with insurance companies, with vendors and with new hires.   Now, as an employed physicians, all of these issues – and many others – are out of sight and out of mind.  But I am still negotiating.  With whom, you wonder? I negotiate with my patients. I’m not suggesting that my doctor-patient relationships are cold, transactional events.   Hardly.   But every relationship, either business or personal, requires give and take.   Sometimes one party gives up some space to accommodate a compromise, and other times the partner behaves similarly.   Indeed, every successful relationship that I have participated in or witnessed is a breathing and flexible organism.   Negotiating with patients is less formal than is depicted here. ...

Some time ago, a patient was sent to me for a scope test.  This is hardly a newsworthy event since I do thousands of scope exams every year.  This patient had a known, benign narrowing at the lower portion of the esophagus, which is called a ring.  Years ago, another gastroenterologist stretched the ring which had been catching food on the way down.  My assigned task was to examine the ring and determine if a stretching was necessary.   This introduction of this case is the set up for the point I wish to make.   Too often, medical decisions are based on objective data without sufficient consideration of the patient.   Consider a few hypothetical examples. An MRI of the back shows disc protrusions in the lumbar spine.   A surgeon reviews the study with the patient and explains the rationale for surgery.   However, a detailed review of the patient’s symptoms suggests that the back pain may not be caused by disc protrusion at all.   I...

I spend more than half of my work week performing endoscopic procedures, the majority of which are colonoscopies.  Many of these colon exams are screening colonoscopies, meaning exams performed in the absence of any symptoms, an effort to reduce colon cancer risk.  This is in contrast to diagnostic colonoscopies which are performed to evaluate symptoms or abnormal lab values such as a low blood count or anemia.  Whether I am performing a screening or a diagnostic exam has no effect on the patient’s experience.  However, it may make a huge difference to the insurance company and your out-of-pocket financial obligations.   But I digress… Many of my procedure patients have previously seen me in the office for consultations.   In other words, they are my patients.   It’s likely that after their procedures that they will be advised to return to my office for continued conversations on their condition.   However, many procedure patients are unkno...

What frustrates patients with the medical profession? What follows is not a scientific survey but merely my recollection of patient gripes over the years. Why is my doctor always late? Poor access to doctors and medical professionals.   This vexes patients more than the other challenges that they endure.   They simply cannot get in to see their doctors who are booked out for months.   What good is having a great physician if his or her schedule is locked down?   Sending these patients to an Urgent Care or an Emergency Room might be a convenient play by the doctors and staff, but this does not serve patents well. Rushed office visits.   I hear this all the time.   I’m sure that I’ve been culpable of this offense at times myself. The doctor is running behind and is under pressure to move the visit along efficiently.   But not all patients operate in this mechanized manner.   They need time to collect their thoughts, and we should permit them to ...

Some time ago, a man came to see me requesting a colonoscopy.  His last colon exam was done about 5 years ago.  He is well into his 80’s and has several significant chronic medical conditions.  He wanted reassurance that he did not have colon cancer.  Who wouldn’t want to be reassured of this?  After questioning him closely and reviewing the medical data I advised him that I was not suspicious that he was harboring a colon malignancy.  The patient, however, was not mollified.  As the professional, I advised that in my judgement the risks of the procedure exceeded the potential benefits.  Indeed, this is the risk calculation that physicians utilize daily when advising patients on diagnostic and therapeutic options. While I didn’t categorically refuse to perform the procedure, I was reluctant to proceed.   I asked the patient’s internist, who knew the patient well, to delve into this issue further with him.   As I did not hear back from ...

 A few days before preparing this post, I greeted a patient who was about to undergo her 5 th colonoscopy.  I was the pilot for the 4 prior excursions.   “You should’ve signed up for the rewards program,” I quipped.  “This one would’ve been free!”  Our patients, with rare exceptions, enjoy our light atmosphere seasoned with some humor.  This does not detract from our seriousness of purpose and commitment to their welfare, and they know it.  Our endoscopy team is comprised of outstanding medical professionals. I care for many patients for whom I have performed all of their colonoscopies, which may exceed 10 procedures.   I recently performed an examination on one of my colitis patients who has unique findings which have remained stable for years.   I know his colon as well as I know his face!   Indeed, if I were shown a photo of his colon, I would immediately be able to name the individual.   So, when we gastroenterologists c...

In the medical profession, there is often more than one correct answer.  Present the same case to 10 seasoned medical practitioners and you will likely hear numerous rational plans of action.  This scenario would be bewildering to patients and their families and is one reason that I have warned patients of the hazards of pursuing a second opinion.  Medicine is not mathematics where there is a single correct answer that can be proved. Medicine is not like math. How does a patient reconcile divergent recommendations offered by medical professionals? Should a formal debate competition be held before patients and their families? How does the medical team reconcile our differing views amongst ourselves? Can we expect ordinary patients and their families to decide if surgery, medication or watchful waiting is the best option?  Despite the current culture of patient autonomy, shouldn’t it be the physicians’ task to direct patients toward wha...

Quite regularly, I am asked to comment on the care of folks who are not my patients.  Often, these are friends or their relatives who are suffering gastrointestinal (GI) distress.  “Would you be able to give her a call”?  On other occasions, a member of my own family wants me to connect with someone who has a GI issue. This is tricky terrain and I navigate it very cautiously.   Obviously, I am not the individual’s doctor and would never assume this role.   The individual shares with me only his version of the facts which may not represent the totality of the medical situation. I don’t have the data and have not performed my own examination..   It would be highly irresponsible and unethical for a physician from afar, who has no professional attachment to the individual, to dispense medical advice or to sow doubts about the quality of the medical care rendered.   Indeed, a physician who crosses a line here can cause confusion and doubt which can have d...

 From time to time, I arrange diagnostic testing to ease patients’ minds.  “Could you scope my esophagus?   My boss was just diagnosed with esophageal cancer.”   “I know I’m not due for my colonoscopy for another 2 years.   But I’d like to do it now just to be on the safe side.   My wife is worried.” “No, the abdominal pain hasn’t changed since I had a CAT scan for it months ago, but maybe I should have another scan now just in case something new developed?” When these requests are offered, I do not automatically acquiesce.   I try to understand better the genesis of the anxiety.   Is it rational?   Is it emotional?   Is there a true medical indication to justify a diagnostic test?   I interpret requests for tests as invitations for dialogue.   Very often, the ensuing conversation can settle the issue entirely obviating the patient’s testing request.   These patients don’t really want a test; they want to be reassu...

In the olden days, physicians had the dominant role in the doctor-patient relationship.  During this era of medical paternalism, physicians gave their best medical advice and patients accepted it.  If the gastroenterologist felt that his patient’s gallbladder had to go, for example, then surgery was sure to follow.  Informed consent – as we now understand its meaning – was not fully practiced.  Patients provided consent but were only partially informed. While medical paternalism has largely become extinct, and is inconsistent with today’s societal and medical mores, it was the template for medical practice until only decades ago.   And while we regard the subjugation of patient autonomy to be a fundamental ethical breach, both physicians and patients during that era were perfectly satisfied with the arrangement.   A patient came to the doctor with medical issues.   The doctor -the medical professional - offered advice that the patient accepted. ...

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...

Gastroenterologists are equipped to assist folks with fecal incontinence (FI) – an awful symptom for reasons that need not be explained.  While many of these individuals experience leakage only occasionally, the fear of an impending episode is ever present.  They leave home wondering if this will be a day when they will experience a lapse in control.  Many remain at home or curtail social activities because of fear and anxiety. So, while the condition is not life threatening, it is an assault on an individual’s quality of life. It’s more common in women and the elderly and is associated with a host of medical conditions.   Fecal incontinence is extremely common in extended care facilities which can result in medical consequences. This post is not to discuss the diagnosis and treatment of this condition.   Indeed, this blog is a medical commentary site, not an ‘ask a doctor’ site. Here’s the point of this post.   More often than not, individuals suff...