Skip to main content

Is My Doctor Qualified?

Image
By

When an individual is hired to do a job, one would think that his or her skills would be carefully assessed prior to tendering a job offer.  Let me offer some examples.

If one is applying to a newspaper (yes, they still exist but print editions will soon be visible only in journalism museums) seeking to become a reporter, the hiring professionals will carefully scour through the applicant’s prior writings.  If writing well and under pressure are job requirements, then the newspaper will want to verify that the applicant has these skills.  It’s possible that the applicant would be asked to submit a writing sample on the spot.

If a man is applying to become a salesman in a high-end men’s clothing boutique, the hiring manager will look for evidence that the applicant knows how to sell, knows men’s clothing and would be able to establish trust and rapport with the store’s clientele.

A close relation recently applied for a coding position in a huge and growing tech company.  He underwent serial interviews and was asked in several of them to solve a coding issue on the spot.  This company wants to know clearly and in advance that the applicant has the necessary skills to perform coding magic.



Job applicants will need to show their skills.

So what do doctors have to demonstrate to their potential employers during the interview process?  I’ve had 3 jobs in my medical career and I’ve also interviewed several doctor applicants over the years.  I think that readers might be surprised how different the vetting process is for physicians compared to the examples I have cited above.

Here is what my prior employers did not directly know about me prior to my signing employment agreements.

  • Did I take detailed and accurate medical histories from my patients?
  • Was I responsive when patients contacted me with concerns or questions?
  • How were my physical examination skills?  I am a gastroenterologist.  Did I know how to examine the liver, for example?
  • What was my approach to delivering bad news to patients and their families?
  • Did I treat the support personnel in the office with respect?
  • Did I order lab and radiology studies appropriately?
  • Did I keep referring physicians and medical professionals fully informed on their patients?
  • Am I compassionate?

My employers simply assumed that I had the requisite skills and character to perform well.  But the current system does not directly vet these necessary professional skills.  They were interested in my volume of endoscopic procedures and if I had ever been sanctioned for a professional breach.  There were letters of reference from colleagues whom I had selected.  Could a case be made to ask a doctor- -applicant to interview and examine a few patients–– real or actors – on the spot to assess what really matters?

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

By
Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...
15 comments
Read more

When Should Doctors Retire?

By
I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...
69 comments
Read more

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

By
How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...
83 comments
Read more