Skip to main content

Diagnostic Tests to Reassure Patients

 From time to time, I arrange diagnostic testing to ease patients’ minds. 

“Could you scope my esophagus?  My boss was just diagnosed with esophageal cancer.” 

“I know I’m not due for my colonoscopy for another 2 years.  But I’d like to do it now just to be on the safe side.  My wife is worried.”

“No, the abdominal pain hasn’t changed since I had a CAT scan for it months ago, but maybe I should have another scan now just in case something new developed?”

When these requests are offered, I do not automatically acquiesce.  I try to understand better the genesis of the anxiety.  Is it rational?  Is it emotional?  Is there a true medical indication to justify a diagnostic test?  I interpret requests for tests as invitations for dialogue.  Very often, the ensuing conversation can settle the issue entirely obviating the patient’s testing request.  These patients don’t really want a test; they want to be reassured.  Physicians use these skills every day.  I can’t count how many times I have been asked, “You don’t think this could be cancer, do you?”  While there are no guarantees in life, there are many circumstances when we can dispel the patient’s cancer fear in a conversation.  However, we physicians choose our words with care.  Which of the following two responses would you expect from a seasoned clinician?

I am certain that you don’t have cancer.

There is nothing in your history or exam that raises any suspicion that you have a serious condition, such as cancer. 


Might these anxious folks in Edvard Munch's painting, entitled Anxiety,
be worried that they have a serious medical condition?

But there are certainly instances when I, and every other clinician on the planet, have ordered a test just to reassure an anxious patient.  I maintain that this approach when used judiciously is justifiable an delivers tangible benefits to patients.  Critics may find this practice to be ethically problematic.  Is it fair to consume resources or to expose patients to risks of complications or to occupy an appointment slot for a test when there no actual medical indication to proceed?   Is it fair for an insurance company to cover these procedures?  Or, should we consider a need to be reassured as an actual medical indication?

If a patient is anxious, there is no guarantee that a negative test result will end the process.  The patient may then propose additional testing 

There may also be times that we physicians are the driving force here.  A doctor may need to be reassured that nothing has been missed and this may lead to more testing. 

I wish we could reassure everyone that they are and will remain well.  I wish the same for me and my loved ones.  But, as we all know, cold reality can collide against us without warning or invitation.  Nevertheless, we should do all that we can within reason to feel reassured

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) Durin...