Skip to main content

Can Doctors Give Medical Advice to Friends?

Quite regularly, I am asked to comment on the care of folks who are not my patients.  Often, these are friends or their relatives who are suffering gastrointestinal (GI) distress.  “Would you be able to give her a call”?  On other occasions, a member of my own family wants me to connect with someone who has a GI issue.

This is tricky terrain and I navigate it very cautiously.  Obviously, I am not the individual’s doctor and would never assume this role.  The individual shares with me only his version of the facts which may not represent the totality of the medical situation. I don’t have the data and have not performed my own examination..  It would be highly irresponsible and unethical for a physician from afar, who has no professional attachment to the individual, to dispense medical advice or to sow doubts about the quality of the medical care rendered.  Indeed, a physician who crosses a line here can cause confusion and doubt which can have deleterious health effects.


Physician agrees to discuss a friend's medical situation.

In some instances, I simply decline to connect with the individual.  In selected instances, I will reach out to folks who have unanswered questions.  I make it clear that these conversations are informal and I will not be giving medical advice or challenging their own physicians’ care.  As we conclude, I always direct these individuals to return to their care teams.   Despite all of these qualifiers, I maintain – and these folks and their families agree – that my conversations with them have value. 

They can ask me every question on their minds as there is no ticking clock in the background.  They often don’t fully understand the rationale for recommended tests or medications which I can explain to them.   They may need clarification why a certain consultant was brought in on the case. I can also suggest questions that they might pose to their medical professionals. 

I serve as a listener and an explainer. These cases remind me how often patients – including mine – might not have the full understanding of their medical situation that we doctors think they have.  I can’t count, for example, how often I have asked a patient why he is on a certain medicine to be told he has no idea. 

Sometimes, all we want is a chance to tell our story and to be heard.


Comments

  1. We learned the art of the "cut off" on med school on the 70s, as in, how to cut people off. This is not as unfeeling as it sounds; some people simple cannot organize their thoughts on a manner that produces a coherent narrative, some are anxious, and others simply have verbal diarrhea. The Art lies in deciding which is which. For friends & relatives seeking a free curbside consult you can always suggest they call the office for an appointment.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...