Skip to main content

When Patients Consult Dr. Google

“I have a food allergy.”

“I have a parasite.”

“I have ‘leaky gut’.”

“I have esophageal spasm.”

These are examples of speculative diagnoses offered to me by patients.  It is natural in the era of the internet, with artificial intelligence (AI) looming, that patients will search for explanatory diagnoses for their symptoms. Who knows?  In time, and sooner than we think, AI’s performance may exceed that of human physicians, as well as other human endeavors.  At that time, AI may be preparing my weekly blog posts as it interferes and takes over the rest of my life. I won’t succumb willingly to this omnipresent and overpowering force, but I acknowledge that it will not be a fair fight.

Most often, patient offered diagnoses are wrong, even though an internet search seems to have nailed the diagnosis precisely.  I have fever, fatigue, muscle aches, headaches and digestive issues.  Google let me straight to malaria!  How did my doctor miss this?


Dr. Google will see you now!

Let me state plainly that there are times that a patient’s suggestion is correct, or at least leads me toward a more fruitful investigative path that I had not considered.  Patients, like physicians, rely upon their experience.  For instance, a patient who has had multiple episodes of diverticulitis, who calls me with the exact same symptoms is likely correct when requesting diverticulitis treatment from me.

True food allergy is very rare.  It is possible, of course, that patients wondering if they are ‘allergic’ to wheat may have an intolerance instead.  Physicians like me test for parasites with some regularity.  Ask your own doctor when was the last time he or she has actually found one.  It’s a very rare event.

Esophageal spasm is very rare.  I can’t recall the last time I’ve seen a true case of this.  Yet, this diagnosis is often erroneously assigned to patients who have no ready explanation for their chest pain.  When in doubt, blame the esophagus.

Leaky gut is an entity that has been popularized in the alternative medical community.  Conventional digestive specialists  are not acquainted with high quality medical evidence of this condition.

Patients want firm diagnoses explaining what ails them.  We physicians are charged with this task.  At times, we are unable to deliver on this mission.

Self-diagnosis by patients, aided by friends and loved ones, can lead to false pathways and dead ends, even if they sound plausible.  However, just because if makes sense, doesn’t mean it’s sensible.  Think of colonic hydrotherapy, a series of treatments to clean out the body of injurious toxins that are alleged to be responsible for various manners of distress.  If only there were high quality supportive medical evidence…

I welcome patients bringing me their thoughts and research findings to their visits.  While their hypotheses may be incorrect, good conversations invariably follow.  And it communicates to me that these patients are empowered and are advocating for themselves, which contributes to ore robust doctor-patient relationship and better outcomes. 

And, as I've commented above, the patient may be right and deserves a fair hearing.

Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...