Skip to main content

When Patients Consult Dr. Google

“I have a food allergy.”

“I have a parasite.”

“I have ‘leaky gut’.”

“I have esophageal spasm.”

These are examples of speculative diagnoses offered to me by patients.  It is natural in the era of the internet, with artificial intelligence (AI) looming, that patients will search for explanatory diagnoses for their symptoms. Who knows?  In time, and sooner than we think, AI’s performance may exceed that of human physicians, as well as other human endeavors.  At that time, AI may be preparing my weekly blog posts as it interferes and takes over the rest of my life. I won’t succumb willingly to this omnipresent and overpowering force, but I acknowledge that it will not be a fair fight.

Most often, patient offered diagnoses are wrong, even though an internet search seems to have nailed the diagnosis precisely.  I have fever, fatigue, muscle aches, headaches and digestive issues.  Google let me straight to malaria!  How did my doctor miss this?


Dr. Google will see you now!

Let me state plainly that there are times that a patient’s suggestion is correct, or at least leads me toward a more fruitful investigative path that I had not considered.  Patients, like physicians, rely upon their experience.  For instance, a patient who has had multiple episodes of diverticulitis, who calls me with the exact same symptoms is likely correct when requesting diverticulitis treatment from me.

True food allergy is very rare.  It is possible, of course, that patients wondering if they are ‘allergic’ to wheat may have an intolerance instead.  Physicians like me test for parasites with some regularity.  Ask your own doctor when was the last time he or she has actually found one.  It’s a very rare event.

Esophageal spasm is very rare.  I can’t recall the last time I’ve seen a true case of this.  Yet, this diagnosis is often erroneously assigned to patients who have no ready explanation for their chest pain.  When in doubt, blame the esophagus.

Leaky gut is an entity that has been popularized in the alternative medical community.  Conventional digestive specialists  are not acquainted with high quality medical evidence of this condition.

Patients want firm diagnoses explaining what ails them.  We physicians are charged with this task.  At times, we are unable to deliver on this mission.

Self-diagnosis by patients, aided by friends and loved ones, can lead to false pathways and dead ends, even if they sound plausible.  However, just because if makes sense, doesn’t mean it’s sensible.  Think of colonic hydrotherapy, a series of treatments to clean out the body of injurious toxins that are alleged to be responsible for various manners of distress.  If only there were high quality supportive medical evidence…

I welcome patients bringing me their thoughts and research findings to their visits.  While their hypotheses may be incorrect, good conversations invariably follow.  And it communicates to me that these patients are empowered and are advocating for themselves, which contributes to ore robust doctor-patient relationship and better outcomes. 

And, as I've commented above, the patient may be right and deserves a fair hearing.

Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...