The nation was transfixed this past Thursday with the sequential testimonies of Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh. It is rare that a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding generates this stratospheric level of intensity and interest. In my recollection, the O.J. Simpson murder trial and the Anita Hill hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee both reached this level. I watched a good deal of the hearings and read about what I was unable to watch. Personally, I don’t think that minds were changed. Nearly every U.S. senator’s mind was firmly decided at the moment that the judge was nominated months ago. Many offered up their strident support or opposition within 24 hours of the announcement of the nomination, if not sooner. I will let readers decide if such a response is the diligent and fair reaction that a nominee and the country deserve. To me, it seems that this massive pre-judgement was offered up without necessary fact finding or standard due dil
MD Whistleblower presents vignettes and commentaries on the medical profession. We peek 'behind the medical curtain' and deliver candor and controversy in every post.