Skip to main content

Medical Myths and Misconceptions

Why do so many unproven recommendations get incorporated into medical dogma? 

Put a jacket on so you don’t catch cold!

Stress causes stomach ulcers.

Caffeine causes _______.  (Fill in the blank since it’s blamed for everything!)

Sugar makes kids hyper.

Colonic cleansing rids the body of evil toxins.

We accept many recommendations as true in the absence of data or in some cases even if data refutes the claim.  Some folks still believe that the measles vaccine causes autism which is been roundly debunked. And dislodging these myths takes effort and time.  When I was a younger doctor, antibiotics were routinely prescribed for sore throats and presumed bacterial ear infections.. When these patients recovered, the antibiotics were credited with the salutary outcome.  Doctors were simply following the teachings and customs of that era.  Nowadays, physicians approach these patients much more conservatively, but this did take a while.

Following a tradition doesn’t mean the practice is sound.  Medical evidence should rule the day.  And if there is no underlying supportive scientific data, then ideally the treatment should be tested to verify efficacy. 


What if your doctor counseled no popcorn ever!


As a gastroenterologist, I have seen many patients who have suffered diverticulitis over the past few decades.  In this disease, there are outpouchings in the large intestine and one of them has become infected or inflamed.  Many of these patients have been strongly advised by their physicians to avoid nuts and seeds from fear that one of them might land in a pouch and stir up another diverticulitis attack.  I have patients who haven’t had a peanut or popcorn in decades.  Of course, if these patients have remained well they will credit their dietary restrictions with this good fortune.  However, there is not a shred of medical evidence that one’s diet has a role in preventing this disease.  Why would physicians advise and patients accept advice that has no supportive evidence?  And to add a measure of irony, new evidence has challenged the established dogma that every patient with diverticulitis should receive antibiotics!

Look, my hands aren’t clean either.  For instance, I’ve recommended fiber to many of my patients with various types of bowel disturbances in the absence of supportive medical evidence.  My guess is that your physician has practiced the 'art of medicine' as well when the science isn't there.

And while having evidence is optimal, the absence of evidence doesn’t mean that the treatment is not effective.  How many things do we do in life that we strongly believe are beneficial but haven’t been tested?  But we should look for a better reason to perpetuate a practice than this is how it has always been done.  At some point, let's shake up the system and ask, 'why are we still doing it this way?'

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Inpatient vs Outpatient Care;: Can Doctors Do Both?

Five years ago, I left hospital wards and emergency rooms behind and entered a new & improved medical practice model, at least for me.  Since then, I only see patients for office consultations and procedures.  Office medicine is a very different trade than hospital practice each having very distinct skill sets.  If I were to return to the hospital now to see patients, it would be uncomfortable for me (and them) having not used these skills for years.  Similarly, hospital-based doctors might find transitioning to an office practice to be clumsy and uncomfortable. While it might seem that a gastroenterologist or any medical specialist should be able to see patients in any location, this is not the case for most of us.   Hospital medical issues are quite different from office medical complaints.   Physicians, as in so many other occupations, need repetition in order to maintain high competency levels.   There’s a reason, for example, that airline pi...