Why do so many unproven recommendations get incorporated into medical dogma?
Put a jacket on so you don’t catch cold!
Stress causes stomach ulcers.
Caffeine causes _______.
(Fill in the blank since it’s blamed for everything!)
Sugar makes kids hyper.
Colonic cleansing rids the body of evil toxins.
We accept many recommendations as true in the
absence of data or in some cases even if data refutes the claim. Some folks still believe that the measles vaccine causes autism which is been roundly debunked. And dislodging these myths takes effort and
time. When I was a younger doctor,
antibiotics were routinely prescribed for sore throats and presumed bacterial ear
infections.. When these
patients recovered, the antibiotics were credited with the salutary outcome. Doctors were simply following the teachings
and customs of that era. Nowadays,
physicians approach these patients much more conservatively, but this did take a while.
Following a tradition doesn’t mean the practice is sound. Medical evidence should rule the day. And if there is no underlying supportive scientific
data, then ideally the treatment should be tested to verify efficacy.
Look, my hands aren’t clean either. For instance, I’ve recommended fiber to many of my patients with various types of bowel disturbances in the absence of supportive medical evidence. My guess is that your physician has practiced the 'art of medicine' as well when the science isn't there.
And while
having evidence is optimal, the absence of evidence doesn’t mean that the
treatment is not effective. How many
things do we do in life that we strongly believe are beneficial but haven’t
been tested? But we should look for a
better reason to perpetuate a practice than this is how it has always been done. At some point, let's shake up the system and ask, 'why are we still doing it this way?'
Comments
Post a Comment