Skip to main content

Medical Myths and Misconceptions

Why do so many unproven recommendations get incorporated into medical dogma? 

Put a jacket on so you don’t catch cold!

Stress causes stomach ulcers.

Caffeine causes _______.  (Fill in the blank since it’s blamed for everything!)

Sugar makes kids hyper.

Colonic cleansing rids the body of evil toxins.

We accept many recommendations as true in the absence of data or in some cases even if data refutes the claim.  Some folks still believe that the measles vaccine causes autism which is been roundly debunked. And dislodging these myths takes effort and time.  When I was a younger doctor, antibiotics were routinely prescribed for sore throats and presumed bacterial ear infections.. When these patients recovered, the antibiotics were credited with the salutary outcome.  Doctors were simply following the teachings and customs of that era.  Nowadays, physicians approach these patients much more conservatively, but this did take a while.

Following a tradition doesn’t mean the practice is sound.  Medical evidence should rule the day.  And if there is no underlying supportive scientific data, then ideally the treatment should be tested to verify efficacy. 


What if your doctor counseled no popcorn ever!


As a gastroenterologist, I have seen many patients who have suffered diverticulitis over the past few decades.  In this disease, there are outpouchings in the large intestine and one of them has become infected or inflamed.  Many of these patients have been strongly advised by their physicians to avoid nuts and seeds from fear that one of them might land in a pouch and stir up another diverticulitis attack.  I have patients who haven’t had a peanut or popcorn in decades.  Of course, if these patients have remained well they will credit their dietary restrictions with this good fortune.  However, there is not a shred of medical evidence that one’s diet has a role in preventing this disease.  Why would physicians advise and patients accept advice that has no supportive evidence?  And to add a measure of irony, new evidence has challenged the established dogma that every patient with diverticulitis should receive antibiotics!

Look, my hands aren’t clean either.  For instance, I’ve recommended fiber to many of my patients with various types of bowel disturbances in the absence of supportive medical evidence.  My guess is that your physician has practiced the 'art of medicine' as well when the science isn't there.

And while having evidence is optimal, the absence of evidence doesn’t mean that the treatment is not effective.  How many things do we do in life that we strongly believe are beneficial but haven’t been tested?  But we should look for a better reason to perpetuate a practice than this is how it has always been done.  At some point, let's shake up the system and ask, 'why are we still doing it this way?'

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...