Skip to main content

Does Diverticulitis Need Antibiotics?

Over the past several years, there has been an important change in how diverticulitis is treated.  This topic sentence may seem out of place on this blog which is largely a site for commentary.  This is not a site that discusses medical breakthroughs on the treatment of constipation or heartburn.  But diverticulitis does offer a commentary angle, if you will read further.

Decades of teaching and dogma have informed the medical profession that diverticulitis is a localized infection of the colon.  Diverticula, or pouches, are weak points in the large bowel.  If a tiny puncture develops at one of these sites, some stool can leak out contaminating the sterile abdominal cavity.  An infection develops which, of course, needs to be treated with antibiotics.

Indeed, for most of my medical career, every case of diverticulitis I encountered was treated with antibiotics.  In most cases, these patients recovered fully.  This observation may be Truth #1. 

Just because a patient recovers with treatment, doesn’t prove that the treatment was responsible.

If a patient is suffering from a cold, which is nearly always caused by a virus, is given antibiotics and recovers, the patient would have recovered anyway as antibiotics aren’t effective against viruses.


It can be a great challenge to leave the herd.

Several years ago, studies demonstrated that certain diverticulitis cases fully recovered without antibiotics.  These folks healed themselves.  This was a paradigm shift in diverticulitis management. We physicians have known for decades that diverticulitis could heal spontaneously since many of our patients would relate prior episodes of this illness for which they did not seek medical attention.  This observation may be Truth #2.

Diverticulitis may not be an infectious disease.

Of course, diverticulitis could still be an infection that is cured by a person’s own natural immunity, without drugs.  But it is also possible that there is no infection involved.  Perhaps, diverticulitis is simply a form of non-infectious colitis, such as Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, which has no known cause.  For all of these decades, doctors simply accepted without challenge that antibiotics were necessary.

I should note that when diverticulitis is complicated or severe, experts continue to advise antibiotics.  

So, here’s the commentary you’ve been patiently waiting for.  Here is Truth #3.

Just because doctors have always done something one way, doesn’t mean it’s correct.

How many untested and unproven practices do we all do in our own lives simply be cause we’ve always done it this way?  This is not a surefire way to make progress.  All it takes is one curious person to shake things up.

 

 

Comments

  1. Thanks, Michael. Changing long standing habits is hard. What do you now do with a patient with classic signs and symptoms of diverticulitis - LLQ pain and tenderness, fever, elevated white cell count?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary