Skip to main content

Does Diverticulitis Need Antibiotics?

Over the past several years, there has been an important change in how diverticulitis is treated.  This topic sentence may seem out of place on this blog which is largely a site for commentary.  This is not a site that discusses medical breakthroughs on the treatment of constipation or heartburn.  But diverticulitis does offer a commentary angle, if you will read further.

Decades of teaching and dogma have informed the medical profession that diverticulitis is a localized infection of the colon.  Diverticula, or pouches, are weak points in the large bowel.  If a tiny puncture develops at one of these sites, some stool can leak out contaminating the sterile abdominal cavity.  An infection develops which, of course, needs to be treated with antibiotics.

Indeed, for most of my medical career, every case of diverticulitis I encountered was treated with antibiotics.  In most cases, these patients recovered fully.  This observation may be Truth #1. 

Just because a patient recovers with treatment, doesn’t prove that the treatment was responsible.

If a patient is suffering from a cold, which is nearly always caused by a virus, is given antibiotics and recovers, the patient would have recovered anyway as antibiotics aren’t effective against viruses.


It can be a great challenge to leave the herd.

Several years ago, studies demonstrated that certain diverticulitis cases fully recovered without antibiotics.  These folks healed themselves.  This was a paradigm shift in diverticulitis management. We physicians have known for decades that diverticulitis could heal spontaneously since many of our patients would relate prior episodes of this illness for which they did not seek medical attention.  This observation may be Truth #2.

Diverticulitis may not be an infectious disease.

Of course, diverticulitis could still be an infection that is cured by a person’s own natural immunity, without drugs.  But it is also possible that there is no infection involved.  Perhaps, diverticulitis is simply a form of non-infectious colitis, such as Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, which has no known cause.  For all of these decades, doctors simply accepted without challenge that antibiotics were necessary.

I should note that when diverticulitis is complicated or severe, experts continue to advise antibiotics.  

So, here’s the commentary you’ve been patiently waiting for.  Here is Truth #3.

Just because doctors have always done something one way, doesn’t mean it’s correct.

How many untested and unproven practices do we all do in our own lives simply be cause we’ve always done it this way?  This is not a surefire way to make progress.  All it takes is one curious person to shake things up.

 

 

Comments

  1. Thanks, Michael. Changing long standing habits is hard. What do you now do with a patient with classic signs and symptoms of diverticulitis - LLQ pain and tenderness, fever, elevated white cell count?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and studying, two longstanding personal pleasures, could be ext

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of the human species.  A pulmon