Skip to main content

Is Cologuard as Good as Colonoscopy?

I am regularly solicited for my opinion on the stool test Cologuard, a colon cancer screening option.  These queries generally come from folks who are angling to avoid the joy of the colonoscopy experience.  It’s hard to fathom why someone would want to avoid the pleasure of a supersized laxative followed by a day of fun on colonoscopy day! 

Scientific investigators are working hard on colon cancer screening blood test options, but as I have pointed out, these are not quite ready for prime time.

Finding alternatives to screening colonoscopy is a very high priority for the medical profession. There are two driving forces.

Colonoscopy, while effective, is a laborious process which is a 2-day experience, requires a driver, frequent time away from work, is expensive and has risk.  If a stool or a blood test could achieve the same level of protection, it would be a game changer.

The economic rewards for launching an effective stool or a blood colon cancer screening test would be astronomical.

While we’re not there yet, I am confident that medical technology will triumph and colonoscopy will be relegated to a much lower tier or might be left off the screening list entirely.  Of course, we will still need skilled colonoscopists in the event the stool or blood screening test is positive.  Ironically, during that era, gastroenterologists will be doing just a small fraction of colonoscopies compared to current practice and they may have less procedural skills because of this.  It is axiomatic that physician proceduralists maintain a high skill level by performing a high volume of procedures.  You’d rather have a cardiac catheterization performed by a doctor who does one or two cases per day rather than one or two cases per month.  Same argument for colonoscopies


Willing to roll the dice on Cologuard?

Once non-invasive screening tests take over, there won’t be routine screening colonoscopies, which constitutes the bulk of my procedure volume now.  Colonoscopies will be done only if non-invasive screening tests are positive.  What will likely occur is that only a minority of gastroenterologists will do these colonoscopies to that they will be able to maintain a high procedure volume for the reasons state above.

I tell patients today that Cologuard has the advantages of simplicity and convenience.  But it can’t rival colonoscopy in terms of protecting against colon cancer.  So patients have to decide which path to take based on their priorities.   The choice is either ease or effectiveness.  

Comments

  1. The problem with current screening DNA tests is that you already have colon cancer for them to be positive, whereas colonoscopy can detect and remove pre-cancerous polyps. BTW, I had my most recent colonoscopy this year with no sedation. Went great and one precancerous polyp was found and removed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...