Skip to main content

Is Cologuard as Good as Colonoscopy?

I am regularly solicited for my opinion on the stool test Cologuard, a colon cancer screening option.  These queries generally come from folks who are angling to avoid the joy of the colonoscopy experience.  It’s hard to fathom why someone would want to avoid the pleasure of a supersized laxative followed by a day of fun on colonoscopy day! 

Scientific investigators are working hard on colon cancer screening blood test options, but as I have pointed out, these are not quite ready for prime time.

Finding alternatives to screening colonoscopy is a very high priority for the medical profession. There are two driving forces.

Colonoscopy, while effective, is a laborious process which is a 2-day experience, requires a driver, frequent time away from work, is expensive and has risk.  If a stool or a blood test could achieve the same level of protection, it would be a game changer.

The economic rewards for launching an effective stool or a blood colon cancer screening test would be astronomical.

While we’re not there yet, I am confident that medical technology will triumph and colonoscopy will be relegated to a much lower tier or might be left off the screening list entirely.  Of course, we will still need skilled colonoscopists in the event the stool or blood screening test is positive.  Ironically, during that era, gastroenterologists will be doing just a small fraction of colonoscopies compared to current practice and they may have less procedural skills because of this.  It is axiomatic that physician proceduralists maintain a high skill level by performing a high volume of procedures.  You’d rather have a cardiac catheterization performed by a doctor who does one or two cases per day rather than one or two cases per month.  Same argument for colonoscopies


Willing to roll the dice on Cologuard?

Once non-invasive screening tests take over, there won’t be routine screening colonoscopies, which constitutes the bulk of my procedure volume now.  Colonoscopies will be done only if non-invasive screening tests are positive.  What will likely occur is that only a minority of gastroenterologists will do these colonoscopies to that they will be able to maintain a high procedure volume for the reasons state above.

I tell patients today that Cologuard has the advantages of simplicity and convenience.  But it can’t rival colonoscopy in terms of protecting against colon cancer.  So patients have to decide which path to take based on their priorities.   The choice is either ease or effectiveness.  

Comments

  1. The problem with current screening DNA tests is that you already have colon cancer for them to be positive, whereas colonoscopy can detect and remove pre-cancerous polyps. BTW, I had my most recent colonoscopy this year with no sedation. Went great and one precancerous polyp was found and removed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...