Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine - Caveat Doctor!

Artificial intelligence (AI) has arrived and will permeate every aspect of our society.  It will touch all of us in our work, in the arts, in entertainment, in our government, and in our culture.  As with all technology, it will deliver us both blessings and curses.  We have been sharply warned of its potential destructive capability even by advocates of this technology.  Will governments, industry, and the public agree on proper guardrails and restraint or will the tiger simply be let out of the cage?  I worry that the strategy will be Ready! Fire! Aim!, instead of adopting thoughtful and prudent measures to keep us safe.  Indeed, I’ve offered some sober thoughts on this issue to my readers in a prior post.

My medical journals are now riddled with studies on various medical uses of AI portending an unimaginable future in the medical profession.

A few paragraphs further down in this post, I will ask my readers a philosophical question regarding AI and I invite a dialogue.  Until recently, we have valued work and accomplishments by our own hands.  The expressions ‘self-made man’ or ‘rags to riches’ typifies the value of achievement through one’s own work without the advantages of wealth or connections.  Indeed, when one achieves because of external or unearned advantages, many of us view the accomplishment differently.  Such an advantaged individual was in effect ‘born on 3rd base.’

Sooner than we think, AI will be able to write books, compose music, create culinary masterpieces, diagnose illnesses, design clothing, and operate motor vehicles – better than we humans can.  Who knows?  Perhaps, AI will also be raising our children, administering counseling and therapy, and entertaining us with faux human comedians and actors!  Fasten your seatbelts.  Turbulence is ahead.


Franz Schubert at the keyboard.

What if AI can make better music than we can?

So, here’s the question for my readers to ponder.  If AI can write an essay, for example, much better than a person can, why should any of us struggle to craft one?  If we can’t rival the literary outcome of AI, why should we struggle to create an inferior product?  Keep in mind that this query is from a blogger who has personally crafted every post on this blog which comprises over 800 essays.  Would my readers be better served if AI created more interesting and engaging posts?  You could craft similar examples of AI vs Humans concerning art, painting, acting, architecture, design, the culinary arts, and hundreds more.  What is our response and purpose if machines can do everything better than we can?

What do you think?  I look forward to your responses which I trust will be your own work.

Comments

  1. Insightful as always. We are in a transition period where AI may be helpful and improve productivity and may increase efficiency, such as creating office notes. Then AI will start to replace Practioners and do things better than we can. It will be a brave new world where we will need to adapt to remain relevant. My suggestion is to enjoy AI and take advantage of it while you can but recognize that eventually things will drastically change.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Physicians should embrace AI as it enhances decision-making through data analysis, leading to more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. Automation of repetitive tasks by AI systems enables physicians to focus more on direct patient care, improving efficiency in healthcare delivery. Embracing AI empowers physicians to stay updated with medical advancements, contributing to the development of innovative solutions that address complex medical challenges and improve public health outcomes. (Written by ChatGPT!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! Perhaps, I should abdicate and permit ChatGPT to take over!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary