Skip to main content

The Risks of Artificial Intelligence

One thing we have all learned about technology is that it cannot be restrained.  With the release of ChatGPT and various competitors, we are aware that an unfathomable technology will disrupt our lives in ways beyond our imagination.  In the coming years 2nd and 3rd generation AI will replace its forerunners. My guess is that this technology will dwarf the impact that the internet has had on all of us. 

It will be able to create and cure and innovate and communicate and build and teach and protect and even drive your car.  As mentioned, future AI functions and capabilities are beyond the horizon and are out of view.

Exciting?  What if your job would be an AI casualty?   It you drive a vehicle for a living, how will you and your family adapt when human drivers are no longer necessary?  Even jobs and occupations that we might believe are beyond AI’s grasp, may be in the crosshairs.  AI’s reach will be boundless.  It’s tentacles will reach through blue collar America and will penetrate deeply into the white collar professional world.

Physicians 10 years ago would have denied that telemedicine could replace office visits.  Ten years from now, AI might be able to replace a physician. 


Telemedicine is now commonplace. 

And like any technology, there will be nefarious consequence from individuals, businesses, nations and non-state actors who have evil intent.  Will the AI industry and the rest of us defer AI’s general use until safeguards and codes of conduct and a robust security infrastructure are in place?  I doubt it. The time to erect safeguards is before a new and controversial technology is released. 

Suppose a business wants to prevail in the marketplace.  The old fashion way is to market a superior product or have a lower price point.  The new way may be to produce credible but false evidence smearing a competitor’s research practices, safety operations, financial dealings or even the personal behavior of the company’s leadership.  Individuals can wield the same technique against a neighbor or a boss.  How will innocent parties be able to defend themselves?   If a videotape clearly shows me robbing a bank, for example, what fate might befall me?   What if a nation receives falsified intelligence that an adversary is launching missiles toward it? Scary thoughts. The destructive potential of AI would make today’s internet hackers and ransomware practitioners seem quaint.

Of course, this technology needs to be regulated.  As always, the challenge will be on achieving agreement on where to draw the line.  Some will regard regulations to be guardrails while others will argue that they are handcuffs.  As an ordinary person, I’d rather have more safety and less innovation.

If you think that our nation and the world is in turmoil now, do you imagine that the emergence of AI would bring us all healing and harmony?

Despite all of my misgivings, I am an AI supporter but want industry and governments to do all they can to protect us.  Of course, risk can't be eliminated but it can be reduced..  And we need a global system that will enforce the rules of the road with real world consequences.  But even with such a robust system, there is no guarantee of compliance.  Our strategy must not be Fire! Ready! Aim! 

Comments

  1. As usual, you your column is prescient and on the nose. I fear that the excitement of innovation with drawn out the voices of caution. We often get ahead of ourselves like this such as in genetic engineering. AI is so widespread and with so many repercussions even Chat GPT can’t imagine them all. Interesting, incredibly helpful and remarkably scary!
    Elliot Davidson, MD

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary