Skip to main content

Will Private Equity Buy Your Hospital?

Advertisers are masters at knowing how certain words and phrases will affect us.  Consider some of the seemingly innocent words and phrases below and how they have an emotional impact.

IRS

Big Tech

Police officers

Corporate profits

Millennials

Congress

The Nursing Profession.

Over time we have been conditioned to experience emotional responses to various phrases and labels.  For instance, there is nothing intrinsically evil in businesses earning money since this is an expected and desirable outcome.  Yet, ask us to react to the term corporate profits and I suspect that most of our reactions would trend negatively.  It’s unlikely that a political candidate would proclaim in an ad or a speech that he or she wants to be a Champion of Corporate Profits!

Private Equity certainly merits inclusion in the above list.  Most folks have an unfavorable opinion of PE even if they don’t fully understand this business model.  And some of the actions committed by PE justify suspicion and outrage, but I don’t support demonizing the industry writ large.  Bad actors are not tantamount to a bad profession.  Similarly, I have argued on this blog that the pharmaceutical industry, which is routinely demonized, is a critical source of cures and treatments that we all so desperately need. Haven’t we seen in the past few years the consequences of demonizing our opponents and adversaries?

Recently, the hospital Summa Health in Akron, Ohio announced that it will be purchased by a private equity firm. While this was big news for northeast Ohio, it is not a unique development.  Nearly 400 hospitals in the U.S. are owned by PE. Beyond health care, a few minutes on your search engine will reveal how may familiar businesses across the country have partnered with PE.

Under new management!

So, is the Summa Health purchase good news?  We’ll have to watch closely.  We know that PE's focus on generating profit could collide with the medical profession’s mission to provide health care to the community.  But companies are sold to PE for a reason. In general, these are companies that are at risk and need additional capital to survive or simply aim to grow.  PE provides the funds and often the managerial expertise to accomplish these goals.  They can improve efficiencies throughout the organization, introduce higher level technology and innovation, provide economy of scale, apply best practices in management, and yes, increase profits.

Just because investors make money doesn't make the project evil.

If PE is so shortsighted and pursues short-term profits at the expense of caregivers and their patients, then the venture will fail.  Every hospital is being strictly scrutinized with quality metrics that are made public. If corners are cut, the news will soon get out.  I think that when PE and the hospital’s interests are aligned, as they should be, that success is much more likely.  If PE puts profits over patients and medical professionals, then medical quality and the hospital's reputation will decline and medical professionals will run for the exits. The hospital’s value will tank.  Such actions and outcomes would banish PE from the healthcare universe and could also invite governmental regulation and oversight, which would discourage investors. 

Realize that PE will have to make changes and some of these may be disruptive and painful.  Some jobs will likely be lost.  But hospitals or businesses are not selling to PE to maintain the status quo. They do so because they need help and there is no available remedy internally.   

Those who distrust PE and oppose their purchase of hospitals, nursing homes, physician practices and other healthcare facilities, need to propose how they would bring financial strength and vitality to players in healthcare who can't make it on their own.  My guess is that there is no obvious alternative solution that created market space for PE to exploit. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...