Skip to main content

Demonizing Big Pharma - Good Politics but Bad Policy

When I was training to become a gastroenterologist decades ago, the heartburn drug Prilosec (omeprazole) was released in the United States.  I prescribed it then to patients who had been suffering from heartburn for most of their lives.  After just days of treatment, their heartburn disappeared.  These folks couldn’t even remember what it felt like to live without heartburn.  And suddenly, they were cured with one small pill daily. 

Now I know that heartburn is not exactly cancer, but this experience very early in my career showed me the potential for a pharmaceutical agent to improve lives.  I still relay this vignette to patients. Pharma is not the enemy.

Think of all of the institutions and professions that we and our politicians demonize -  lawyers, oil companies, congress, corporate America, Big Tech and the pharmaceutical industry.  Recently, Ivy League universities have been promoted to a top ten ranking on this coveted list.  On a granular level, even individuals routinely demonize others who might harbor a different political view or have planted the ‘wrong’ yard sign during election season.

I don’t fully grasp how we Americans reached this point or how we find our way out of this labyrinth.  And as I look across the political landscape with a presidential election looming, I don’t forecast peace in the valley anytime soon.   

The irony is that we raise our fists and foam at the mouth against a profession until the moment that we need this profession ourselves.  For instance, we deride attorneys as soulless agents of avarice, but when we need an attorney…


Is demonization the best way to achieve progress?

A few days before penning this post the White House bragged, Oh no.  We’ve upset Big Pharma again.  This message to the public and voters was to convey that the government is on their side by virtue of being against the drug companies.  This might be good politics but it doesn’t strike me as good policy.  It’s fair game to criticize the drug industry for pricing, corporate policies, attention to profits or marketing strategies.  I oppose, for instance, drug companies flooding the airwaves with drug commercials which often follow one another in succession.  Remember, the purpose of an ad is to sell a product.

Criticizing an industry or a profession is very different from demonizing it.  Why would we demonize an industry that we all need and depend on?  Aren’t we all desperate for new treatments for cancer, dementia, arthritis, depression and autoimmune diseases?  Where do you think these treatments are going to come from?  Is it good strategy to paint these folks as enemies?  I expect such an approach from our politicians but the rest of us should know better.  

 

Comments

  1. Those that have been in this business for a while have witnessed truly remarkable medications and therapeutics. Some that come to mind are statins and human insulin. Before statins, our choices to reduce cholesterol were mostly lousy and statins have made many a CV surgeon less busy. Pork insulin was all we had once and patients developed antibodies. Someone figured out how to get bacteria to make HUMAN insulin and millions have benefited. Thanks for a good column. You have given me another good idea for a podcast!!
    Elliot Davidson, MD

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary