Skip to main content

The Risks of Artificial Intelligence

One thing we have all learned about technology is that it cannot be restrained.  With the release of ChatGPT and various competitors, we are aware that an unfathomable technology will disrupt our lives in ways beyond our imagination.  In the coming years 2nd and 3rd generation AI will replace its forerunners. My guess is that this technology will dwarf the impact that the internet has had on all of us. 

It will be able to create and cure and innovate and communicate and build and teach and protect and even drive your car.  As mentioned, future AI functions and capabilities are beyond the horizon and are out of view.

Exciting?  What if your job would be an AI casualty?   It you drive a vehicle for a living, how will you and your family adapt when human drivers are no longer necessary?  Even jobs and occupations that we might believe are beyond AI’s grasp, may be in the crosshairs.  AI’s reach will be boundless.  It’s tentacles will reach through blue collar America and will penetrate deeply into the white collar professional world.

Physicians 10 years ago would have denied that telemedicine could replace office visits.  Ten years from now, AI might be able to replace a physician. 


Telemedicine is now commonplace. 

And like any technology, there will be nefarious consequence from individuals, businesses, nations and non-state actors who have evil intent.  Will the AI industry and the rest of us defer AI’s general use until safeguards and codes of conduct and a robust security infrastructure are in place?  I doubt it. The time to erect safeguards is before a new and controversial technology is released. 

Suppose a business wants to prevail in the marketplace.  The old fashion way is to market a superior product or have a lower price point.  The new way may be to produce credible but false evidence smearing a competitor’s research practices, safety operations, financial dealings or even the personal behavior of the company’s leadership.  Individuals can wield the same technique against a neighbor or a boss.  How will innocent parties be able to defend themselves?   If a videotape clearly shows me robbing a bank, for example, what fate might befall me?   What if a nation receives falsified intelligence that an adversary is launching missiles toward it? Scary thoughts. The destructive potential of AI would make today’s internet hackers and ransomware practitioners seem quaint.

Of course, this technology needs to be regulated.  As always, the challenge will be on achieving agreement on where to draw the line.  Some will regard regulations to be guardrails while others will argue that they are handcuffs.  As an ordinary person, I’d rather have more safety and less innovation.

If you think that our nation and the world is in turmoil now, do you imagine that the emergence of AI would bring us all healing and harmony?

Despite all of my misgivings, I am an AI supporter but want industry and governments to do all they can to protect us.  Of course, risk can't be eliminated but it can be reduced..  And we need a global system that will enforce the rules of the road with real world consequences.  But even with such a robust system, there is no guarantee of compliance.  Our strategy must not be Fire! Ready! Aim! 

Comments

  1. As usual, you your column is prescient and on the nose. I fear that the excitement of innovation with drawn out the voices of caution. We often get ahead of ourselves like this such as in genetic engineering. AI is so widespread and with so many repercussions even Chat GPT can’t imagine them all. Interesting, incredibly helpful and remarkably scary!
    Elliot Davidson, MD

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...