Skip to main content

Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment - Enemies of Health Care Reform

If we ever manage to tame Over-diagnosis and Over-treatment – the twin threats to medical reform - many players in the medical universe would find their status - and their livelihoods- downgraded to critical condition. 

Let me offer a single sentence that points out the herculean challenge facing reformers.

One man’s wasteful medical spending is another man’s income.


 You Need the Strength of Hercules to Reform Health Care

The system is riddled with conflicts of interest where various economic interests collide with our health interests.

Here are three hypothetical examples to illustrate my point.  

Political progressives clamor to sharply reduce drug prices to make them affordable for all Americans.  The pharmaceutical industry uses all means necessary to resist this. Of course, making all drugs affordable would crush the drug companies economically.  They argue that such a draconian approach would stifle research, development, and innovation.  Why should a drug company risk investing zillions to develop a cancer vaccine without the promise of great financial reward for the company and the investors?

Healthcare reform advocates want to establish a ‘Medicare for All’ plan, which is essentially a single-payer system.  Commercial insurance companies – who would face elimination – argue that Americans would suffer under government-run socialized medicine.  “Americans deserve a choice in the marketplace,” they would argue.  “Do we want health care run like the Bureau of Motor Vehicles?”
We need to curb our overuse of medical imaging.  One reason that so many patients undergo unnecessary CAT scans is that there’s an imaging center practically on every corner.  Hospital radiology departments are economic engines for hospitals. Restraining radiology testing would improve our health and save zillions, but it would have economic consequences for hospitals, radiologists and investors, all of whom would be expected to push back.  (If you are unclear why this extra testing harms health, type in overdiagnosis in this blog's search box.)
It won’t be easy to untie this Gordian knot.  The challenges I highlight with my profession are not unique to medicine.  Do you think it’s easy to make a dent in streamlining the Military Industrial Complex?  We have all heard of a politician who refuses to close a military base or a weapon manufacturer in his district that the military doesn’t want anymore.  Make sense?
Would you give up your job or close down your company to save the greater good?



Comments

  1. You forgot medical liability as a primary cause of over utilization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Medical liability is a necessity until the medical profession develops a robust way to make practitioners accountable.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...