Skip to main content

Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment - Enemies of Health Care Reform

If we ever manage to tame Over-diagnosis and Over-treatment – the twin threats to medical reform - many players in the medical universe would find their status - and their livelihoods- downgraded to critical condition. 

Let me offer a single sentence that points out the herculean challenge facing reformers.

One man’s wasteful medical spending is another man’s income.


 You Need the Strength of Hercules to Reform Health Care

The system is riddled with conflicts of interest where various economic interests collide with our health interests.

Here are three hypothetical examples to illustrate my point.  

Political progressives clamor to sharply reduce drug prices to make them affordable for all Americans.  The pharmaceutical industry uses all means necessary to resist this. Of course, making all drugs affordable would crush the drug companies economically.  They argue that such a draconian approach would stifle research, development, and innovation.  Why should a drug company risk investing zillions to develop a cancer vaccine without the promise of great financial reward for the company and the investors?

Healthcare reform advocates want to establish a ‘Medicare for All’ plan, which is essentially a single-payer system.  Commercial insurance companies – who would face elimination – argue that Americans would suffer under government-run socialized medicine.  “Americans deserve a choice in the marketplace,” they would argue.  “Do we want health care run like the Bureau of Motor Vehicles?”
We need to curb our overuse of medical imaging.  One reason that so many patients undergo unnecessary CAT scans is that there’s an imaging center practically on every corner.  Hospital radiology departments are economic engines for hospitals. Restraining radiology testing would improve our health and save zillions, but it would have economic consequences for hospitals, radiologists and investors, all of whom would be expected to push back.  (If you are unclear why this extra testing harms health, type in overdiagnosis in this blog's search box.)
It won’t be easy to untie this Gordian knot.  The challenges I highlight with my profession are not unique to medicine.  Do you think it’s easy to make a dent in streamlining the Military Industrial Complex?  We have all heard of a politician who refuses to close a military base or a weapon manufacturer in his district that the military doesn’t want anymore.  Make sense?
Would you give up your job or close down your company to save the greater good?



Comments

  1. You forgot medical liability as a primary cause of over utilization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Medical liability is a necessity until the medical profession develops a robust way to make practitioners accountable.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary