Skip to main content

Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment - Enemies of Health Care Reform

If we ever manage to tame Over-diagnosis and Over-treatment – the twin threats to medical reform - many players in the medical universe would find their status - and their livelihoods- downgraded to critical condition. 

Let me offer a single sentence that points out the herculean challenge facing reformers.

One man’s wasteful medical spending is another man’s income.


 You Need the Strength of Hercules to Reform Health Care

The system is riddled with conflicts of interest where various economic interests collide with our health interests.

Here are three hypothetical examples to illustrate my point.  

Political progressives clamor to sharply reduce drug prices to make them affordable for all Americans.  The pharmaceutical industry uses all means necessary to resist this. Of course, making all drugs affordable would crush the drug companies economically.  They argue that such a draconian approach would stifle research, development, and innovation.  Why should a drug company risk investing zillions to develop a cancer vaccine without the promise of great financial reward for the company and the investors?

Healthcare reform advocates want to establish a ‘Medicare for All’ plan, which is essentially a single-payer system.  Commercial insurance companies – who would face elimination – argue that Americans would suffer under government-run socialized medicine.  “Americans deserve a choice in the marketplace,” they would argue.  “Do we want health care run like the Bureau of Motor Vehicles?”
We need to curb our overuse of medical imaging.  One reason that so many patients undergo unnecessary CAT scans is that there’s an imaging center practically on every corner.  Hospital radiology departments are economic engines for hospitals. Restraining radiology testing would improve our health and save zillions, but it would have economic consequences for hospitals, radiologists and investors, all of whom would be expected to push back.  (If you are unclear why this extra testing harms health, type in overdiagnosis in this blog's search box.)
It won’t be easy to untie this Gordian knot.  The challenges I highlight with my profession are not unique to medicine.  Do you think it’s easy to make a dent in streamlining the Military Industrial Complex?  We have all heard of a politician who refuses to close a military base or a weapon manufacturer in his district that the military doesn’t want anymore.  Make sense?
Would you give up your job or close down your company to save the greater good?



Comments

  1. You forgot medical liability as a primary cause of over utilization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Medical liability is a necessity until the medical profession develops a robust way to make practitioners accountable.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...