Skip to main content

Inpatient vs Outpatient Care;: Can Doctors Do Both?

Five years ago, I left hospital wards and emergency rooms behind and entered a new & improved medical practice model, at least for me.  Since then, I only see patients for office consultations and procedures.  Office medicine is a very different trade than hospital practice each having very distinct skill sets.  If I were to return to the hospital now to see patients, it would be uncomfortable for me (and them) having not used these skills for years.  Similarly, hospital-based doctors might find transitioning to an office practice to be clumsy and uncomfortable.

While it might seem that a gastroenterologist or any medical specialist should be able to see patients in any location, this is not the case for most of us.  Hospital medical issues are quite different from office medical complaints.  Physicians, as in so many other occupations, need repetition in order to maintain high competency levels.  There’s a reason, for example, that airline pilots need to maintain specified flying hours.  Athletes, musicians, heart surgeons, comedians, police officers, paramedics or therapists all need a certain volume of clients and customers to maintain their professional edges.  Consider an example to illustrate this point.  If you needed to have a cardiac catheterization, would you favor a cardiologist who performs the procedure several times each week or three times yearly?  (Hint: this is an easy question.)


Airline pilots need frequent flying to stay sharp.

If I were thrown back into the hospital now to see gastro patients, I would be confronting issues that I have not seen for years.  There are likely new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in place. Medications have changed.   I might very well be both out of practice and out of date.  While I could probably muddle through, I think that patients are entitled to a higher medical standard than muddling.

I recall years ago, I gave up performing an advanced endoscopic procedure.  I recognized that my low volume of cases was not sufficient to maintain a high-quality level.  So, I eliminated the procedure from my clinical repertoire and have since referred these patients to more expert practitioners.  All professionals and tradesmen should know their limitations and disclose them freely to their customers.  I have yet to hear a patient complain when I remark that I am referring the patient to a more capable or experienced physician.

My current office medical skills are sharp and current.  The outpatient arena has become my lane of comfort and competence.  At the end of this road will be my retirement.  I hope that I will have the necessary skills for that occupation.

 

 

 

Comments

  1. As a family physician practicing for 39 years and having been relegated to outpatient practice since 2007 and retiring on 8/1/24, at age 72, I will say this has been the hardest transition/phase of my life. I deeply miss the relationships that I have had with many patients for over 30 years, having practiced in the same practice for 35 years . Also there is the loss of purpose and identity which I need to work through.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why retire or is this a forced retirement?

      Delete
  2. exactly in the same position for the past 12 years. I felt temporary loss of purpose and certainly some loss of revenue, but feel that the outpatient medicine model, when well-organized, should be the main avenue for gastroenterologists and GI patients. Never heard a patient complain when i tell them someone else more equipped will see them if they get admitted to the hospital

    ReplyDelete
  3. My father was a GP and saw patients in the hospital in the morning and had office hours in the afternoon; that's what medical practice is, or should be. If you can't do both then you're not much of a physician.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't really agree. There is a different skillset for hospital and outpatient medicine, and sometimes different meds, lab tests, etc. It was easier in the past to do both. I always maintained my skills for both settings and felt comfortable in both settings, but not everyone does.

      Delete
    2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484472/

      I disagree. The studies show improvement in patient care with hospitalists.

      Delete
    3. I did both for 40 years and only office for the last 5 years. Hospital practice is better for our established patient's care, but is 90% of stress and inefficiency for us. The best part of hospital practice was dealing with physician colleagues on a personal level.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) Durin...