Lowering Cardiac Risk by 30%

Lowering Cardiac Risk by 30% - Not So Fast!

The raison d’etre of MDWhistleblower is to give readers a peek ‘behind the medical curtain’. This post is true to this mission.

I offer readers a lesson that I have shared with patients, friends and family over the years. I suspect that elements of my point have been covered in prior posts. As I have penned over 800 posts since 2009, I hope readers will forgive me of an example or two of repetition.

There is a frequent technique that I’m about to share that misleads patients about the value of various medical tests or treatments. While these communications to the public are technically true, they are misleading. Let me explain.

If you saw a product or medical test from reputable organizations that promised to cut your risk of a heart attack by 30%, would you be interested? Odds are that you would be very interested. Who wouldn’t want their risk of a heart attack to be cut by nearly a third?

Medicine is riddled with similar promises of benefit for various conditions offering attractive relative risk reductions for various conditions.

Let me take you behind the curtain!

Please follow this paragraph below very carefully. Understanding my point will greatly empower you.

With respect to the heart attack example above, you must know what your existing risk of a heart attack is. (There are simple formulas available that calculate your risk of a cardiac event over the next several years.) For most of us, our risk of a heart attack is fortunately quite low. Let’s assume that an individual has a 2% risk of suffering a heart attack over the next 5 years. In other words, this person is already very unlikely to have a heart attack. Reducing his already very low 2% risk of heart attack by 30% will lower the heart attack risk to 1.4%. This is referred to as the absolute risk reduction.

When viewed in these terms, most folks wouldn’t find this trivial risk reduction to be a game changer, even though it is a ‘30% reduction in risk.. And, if the risk-reducing medication carried some risk, then the argument favoring it becomes even weaker.

I’m not advising for or against any specific treatments that your physician may recommend or you may have read about. I do want patients to realize that relative risk reductions, such as I presented with my 30% heart attack example, can be very misleading. Absolute risk reductions, in contrast, give much more meaningful information with respect to the benefit that the individual would truly enjoy.

The medical profession, like so many other occupations and organizations, looks a lot different 'behind the curtain’.

Comments

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and studying, two longstanding personal pleasures, could be ext

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients? Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession? Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease. This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses. So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit. Physicians, after all, are members of the human species. A pulmon

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog