I am on the record in opposition of Ohio’s system for authorizing the use of medical marijuana. While I am not an expert on the issue, my reading over several years has informed me that persuasive medical evidence of safety and efficacy – the legal and regulatory standard used for prescription drug approval - is lacking for nearly all ‘approved’ uses of this drug. And while it is true that there is some evidence that marijuana offers benefit in a very narrow range of medical conditions, the broad claim of efficacy for a panoply of illnesses is unfounded scientifically. Champions of medical marijuana use should want, if not demand, that the drug is vetted and tested under the auspices of the Food and Drug Administration. Wouldn’t you want to be assured of any drug’s safety and efficacy? Should anecdotes of benefit or beliefs of benefit be sufficient to release a medication for general use? Is this the standard that we use to approve drugs used t...
MD Whistleblower presents vignettes and commentaries on the medical profession. We peek 'behind the medical curtain' and deliver candor and controversy in every post.