Skip to main content

Treating Diverticulitis Without Antibiotics? Let's Negotiate!

Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox.

Some time ago, I penned a post illustrating the common practice of physicians negotiating with patients.  Here, I will offer other examples of this phenomenon, which is an integral element of the doctor-patient relationship. Patients who understand how this process works will have an additional tool to advocate for their health.

These negotiations are give and take exercises that are successful when both parties feel good afterwards.

Realize that these negotiations are different from conventional business discussions which tend to be zero sum games between adversaries.  In the doctor-patient scenario, both participants’ interests are aligned; both are on the patients’ side. 

Finally, for a negotiation to succeed, each side must be willing to be flexible and reasonable. We must also recognize that there will be red lines that cannot be crossed.  Consider this hypothetical example:

Physician:  Jim, I strongly suspect that you have acute appendicitis.  I’ll have a surgeon meet you in the emergency room.  I think you may need surgery today.

Jim:  Doc, I have an afternoon flight out of town for a playoff game.  I’ll be fine.  Can I just take a shot of penicillin or something?

It is unlikely that Jim’s doctor will accommodate Jim’s request.  Being flexible does not mean sacrificing fundamental principles and sound judgement.


Penicillin production in 1944.

Here’s an anecdote from my own practice.

Patient:  I think my diverticulitis is acting up.

Whistleblower:  I agree, but it seems like a mild case.

Patient:  Better give me some antibiotics before it really takes off.

Whistleblower:  We now believe that mild cases can heal themselves without antibiotics.  There is high-quality medical evidence supporting this.  And antibiotics have real risks.  Have you ever heard of C diff?

Patient:  I’ve always had antibiotics in the past and recovered every time.  I’d be nervous to do nothing.

Whistleblower:  I understand.  Of course, in those past episodes, it may be that you would have recovered on your own without antibiotics.   How about I write you a prescription for antibiotics so it’s available to youSee how you are doing over the next 2-3 days.  If you continue to improve, as I expect, then you can simply continue to heal on your own.  If, however, there is any worsening of your condition, you can begin the antibiotics.

Patient:  I’m okay with that.   I’ll feel better knowing that the antibiotics are available if I need them.

Situations as described above are commonplace in physicians’ offices.  Remember that we physicians cannot guarantee perfect outcomes.  Our sound advice might not deliver for the patient.  It’s all about considering the risks and benefits of the reasonable options.   Imagine how much better our medical advice and life advice would be if we could peer into the future.  I’m sure that the artificial intelligence wizards are working on this right now!

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...