Skip to main content

Will Artificial Intelligence Replace Physicians and the Rest of Us?

Image
By

Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox.


I have written about labor unions on the blog from time to time.  I have lambasted the teachers unions, for example, for their self-serving positions during the Covid-19 pandemics.   On the other hand, I have supported hospital nurses organizing as the power imbalance between them and their employers has stifled needed reform.  And I have mused about employed physicians who are threatened with burnout and endless burdens seeking union protections.

Earlier on the day that I penned this post, I read of a labor agreement between a dockworkers union and its employer.  Fortunately, a strike was avoided.  The agreement has yet to be formally ratified.  One of the union's primary concerns was plans to introduce automation that would require fewer workers.  Management wants technology to increase productivity and efficiency.  While layoffs were not a stated goal, the union had understandable concerns that this could be an outcome.

Time for the medical profession to organize?

Automation, robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) are going to disrupt our society beyond what we can imagine.  Despite my angst and hostility over the risks and negative consequences of the tech invasion (don’t get me started on social media!), its conquest is assured.  We can hope to manage it, but I fear this will be like fighting against a tidal wave armed with a tablespoon.  Yes, there will be chatter about using AI responsibly with agreements and guardrails, but the appetite for the AI revolution will blow past all barriers and ethical restraints.  How well have we done protecting ourselves and our kids from the excesses of Meta (Facebook), Instagram, WhatsApp, Tik Tok, etc? (Answer: Not good!)

Just recently Meta announced that it will abandon fact checking for reasons that have much more to do with politics than avoiding censorship.  Even Mark Zuckerberg admitted that this meant that they were ‘going to catch less bad stuff.’

Should workers demand and expect protections if technology can do their jobs better or cheaper?  Not long ago SAG-AFTRA, a union of actors and television and radio artists, was highly agitated over the use of AI. Increasingly, I think we’ll be watching films starring digital ‘actors’ who will appear ‘human’.  If they can play their roles well and cost a fraction of traditional actors, should studios be prohibited from using them?  Should we outlaw autonomous driving trucks to protect truck drivers?

Let me get personal.  AI has entered my profession, and it is seeping across the medical landscape.  When an AI ‘physician’ can diagnose and treat patients better than I can, what should my position be?

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

By
Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...
15 comments
Read more

When Should Doctors Retire?

By
I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...
69 comments
Read more

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

By
How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...
83 comments
Read more