Skip to main content

Why COVID-19 divided us and still does.

Here is the 2nd of a 3-part series on the COVID-19 follies.  Last week, I opined that COVID-19 is now greeted with a collective yawn by Americans.  We have moved on but the virus is still here.  COVID-19 vaccine interest has also certainly waned.  Another yawn.

How do I regard the vaccine?  Over my long medical career, I have witnessed true miraculous medical milestones.  Operation Warp Speed in Trump’s first administration was one of them.  This program delivered highly safe and highly effective COVID-19 vaccines into our arms in less than a year – a truly monumental scientific achievement. Millions of lives were saved.  Perhaps, you or a loved one was one of them?

Americans were scrambling to receive the initial vaccine series.  This achievement was accomplished using mRNA technology, which has been disparaged by many, as I pointed out in last week’s post.  Had our scientists not utilized it, how many more lives would have been lost?  Perhaps, you or a loved one may have been one of them?

However, over time, the public has clearly lost interest in the virus and the vaccines that are available to combat it.

Why has this happened?  To begin, the disease is no longer viewed as the threat that it once was. We are not walking around in masks and maintaining a zone of separation from others. Many believe that the efficacy of later boosters and vaccines is less than that of the original vaccine series.  There is also a reasonable belief that many of us have acquired a good measure of immunity from prior immunizations as well as from COVID infections. 


Two individuals expressing disagreement over COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

But these are not the only reasons explaining vaccine reluctance.  Politics infected our national public health landscape.  I admit that I was unprepared for this development and was truly shocked when it occurred.  I naively expected that the pandemic would be a unifying experience since disease should be immune from politics.  We were not debating a tax or tariff issue or the administration’s immigration policy or climate change regulations. We expect political involvement in political issues like these.  But a pandemic?  A virus was ripping across the country and the planet with no political agenda or target.  I wrongly thought that this global health catastrophe would have united us in a shared purpose to fight back with every available weapon in a mission to save lives.

Instead, the virus further fueled division and polarization.  We fought over vaccine mandates, Ivermectin, masks, lockdowns, government overreach and the origin of the pandemic.  Many even vilified Dr. Anthony Fauci who had served the nation in public health for nearly 4 decades.  I recall as a medical resident decades ago, reading Dr. Fauci's seminal 1978 paper on  vasculitis – a group of complex diseases of the circulatory system – and keeping the article in my files to be reread over the years.  Did Dr. Fauci deserve any criticism for his pandemic decision?  Of course.  But personal attacks and vilification were indecent. 

Was there government overreach?  Next week, I’ll address this. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...