Skip to main content

Is My Esophagus Causing Chest Pain:?

Gastroenterologists see patients for chest pain regularly.  This is because the esophagus is a potential origin of various chest symptoms.  We all know that heartburn and belching, for example, can be manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease, or GERD.   But the esophagus is not always the culprit responsible for chest distress!

When I am seeing a patient with chest pain, my highest professional obligation is to consider if there might be a cardiac explanation.  If I am at all suspicious, then I will direct the patient to an appropriate practitioner, which may be the primary physician.  Years ago, I sent a patient with chest pain directly to the emergency room.  From there, he was sent for cardiac catheterization when a stent was placed..  Nearly every doctor could relate a similar anecdote.

Oftentimes, chest pain patients are sent to me by cardiologists so I can be secure that a cardiac explanation has been excluded,  On other occasions, patients are sent to GI specialists by emergency room physicians or others who have determined that the chest pain is not cardiac.  “It must be your esophagus”, these patients are told.  This is how the esophagus fuse gets lit.


Just because the heart is okay, doesn't mean the esophagus is sick.

These patients who are often given the clumsy label of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), are told that their esophagus is the likely cause of their chest pain.  And this makes perfect sense to the patients, some of whom come to my office wanting treatment for their ‘esophageal spasm’. 

But it’s not that simple.  Most of these individuals have no esophageal disease or condition.  Their scope exams of the esophagus are usually normal and they do not respond to medicines commonly given for esophageal disorders.   And trueesophageal spasm, when a squeezing esophagus can cause pain, is rare.

Telling a patient that the esophagus is likely innocent when he has been told that  it is the offender can lead to an interesting conversation with a bewildered patient.

There can be an element of mystery about the cause of chest pain or pain elsewhere. In one example, we are now aware that there are individuals who suffer ‘heartburn’ but do not have true GERD. They do not have excessive acid in the esophagus. This is why conventional heartburn medicines to not relieve their condition which is called functional heartburn. 

So what are all of these chest pain patients suffering?  I don’t know.  But just because the heart has been deemed innocent does not meant that the esophagus is guilty.  Perhaps, we gastroenterologists should take a lesson from our cardiology colleagues and label these patients as having non-esophageal chest pain (NECP).

To be fair, there are certainly patients with chest symptoms who are found to have e3sophageal disease.  But there remains a group of them with no explanatory diagnosis.

Perhaps, with medical progress, we will discover esophageal explanations for some of these suffering patients..  But for now, the terrain remains quite murky and frustrating.


 Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...