Skip to main content

How Often do I Need a Colonoscopy?

When is my next colonoscopy due?  Patient's ask me this all the time.

While this inquiry would seem to lead to a straightforward response, it often doesn’t.  Why is this the case?  Isn’t there a simple chart instructing gastroenterologists when the next exam is due?   Yes, there are published guidelines, which were recently revised in 2019, but not everyone follows them.  Some physicians advise the same colonoscopy intervals that they have been recommending for many years.  Others rely upon their own judgement rather than consulting with professional guidelines.  More often than you might think, patients are the driving force such as when they request a colonoscopy sooner than is medically necessary.  I have heard many times patients relating vignettes such as ‘my friend was just diagnosed with colon cancer.  I know I’m not due until next year but can we schedule it now?’  And keep in mind that when any new medical guideline is issued, it takes time for practitioners to adjust to the changes, even though one might think that this transition should be seemless. 



The Medical Profession Moves Slowly

Sometimes, gastroenterologists like me just have to wing it when the relevant information is not available, not known or no longer obtainable. 

In an ideal world, this is what I need to know to give a precise and accurate recommendation on the timing of the next colonic intrusion.

  • When exactly was your last colonoscopy?
  • If polyps were removed, what type of polyps were they?
  • How large were the polyps?
  • If any close relatives had polyps, what types of polyps were they and what were the relatives’ ages when the polyps were discovered?
  • If a close relative had colon cancer, what was the age at diagnosis?

I’ll let readers surmise how often patients have this information available.  I’ll give you a hint – almost never.  Quite often, they are not even certain if they had polyps or not.  “I think I had a polyp.  Maybe it was ‘piles’?  Not sure.”

Of course, it’s optimal if I have the patient’s prior colonoscopy report in front of me.  This permits me to verify that the exam was complete and the colon was spanking clean after the prep allowing for complete visualization.  If an area was not well seen, then this could justify performing the next exam sooner.

While I rely upon published guidelines, often I have to call an audible.  This is part of the job.  Every day doctors are trying to give our best advice when we don’t have all the data that we need. 

Editor’s Note: For 16 years, I've published weekly essays here on Blogspot, which will continue. I’ve now begun publishing my work on a new blogging platform, Substack, and I hope you’ll join me there. Please enter your email address at this link to receive my posts directly to your inbox. Let the dialogue begin! And thanks for reading!

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...