Skip to main content

Does a Positive Cologuard Mean I Have Cancer?

Cologuard is a sophisticated stool test that checks for microscopic blood and altered DNA which can signal the presence of colon cancer or precancerous polyps.  Some patients are attracted to this non-invasive option rather than to traditional colonoscopy experience which includes the ever popular cathartic cocktail.

This test was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014.   The test was initially quite popular as patients and physicians were enthusiastic about this new colon cancer screening option.  Often in medicine, what’s new becomes popular but initial enthusiasm tends to ebb over time.  (With time, the initial safety and efficacy reports for medicines and diagnostic tests may not be sustained.  This is why post-marketing surveillance after initial approval is so critical.) Patients were advised early on, as they are now, that a positive Cologuard test meant that a follow up colonoscopy was mandatory. Certainly, when I order this test for a patient who is aiming to avoid a colonoscopy, I secure their agreement to a subsequent colon exam if the stool test result is positive. 

Gastroenterologists and physicians in those early years after FDA approval regarded positive Cologuard results very seriously.   This was not yesterday’s stool smear for microscopic blood.  Cologuard detected actual DNA fragments that could be derived from actual cancer or significant colon polyps.



Cologuard detects abnormal DNA fragments.

In those early years, when I was evaluating positive Cologuard patients, I was concerned that these colons had a high probability of harboring significant lesions.  When I was doing colonoscopies on such patients and discovered no abnormalities, I would prolong the exam to re-examine various regions of the colon concerned that I had overlooked the important finding that caused the positive Cologuard.   I often had lingering worry afterwards that I had missed a significant finding.

As the years went by, and the medical profession accumulated more experience, we learned that false positive Cologuard tests were common.  Now, when these colon exams are normal, I recognize that this is a fortunate and common outcome. 

Many positive Cologuard patients are often positive that they have cancer.  The vast majority of them will have either a normal colonoscopy or benign polyps.  So, while I still recommend that every individual with a positive Cologuard result pursue the joy of colonoscopy, the probability that they have an actual cancer is quite low.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...