Does a Positive Cologuard Mean I Have Cancer?

Cologuard is a sophisticated stool test that checks for microscopic blood and altered DNA which can signal the presence of colon cancer or precancerous polyps. Some patients are attracted to this non-invasive option rather than to traditional colonoscopy experience which includes the ever popular cathartic cocktail.

This test was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014. The test was initially quite popular as patients and physicians were enthusiastic about this new colon cancer screening option. Often in medicine, what’s new becomes popular but initial enthusiasm tends to ebb over time. (With time, the initial safety and efficacy reports for medicines and diagnostic tests may not be sustained. This is why post-marketing surveillance after initial approval is so critical.) Patients were advised early on, as they are now, that a positive Cologuard test meant that a follow up colonoscopy was mandatory. Certainly, when I order this test for a patient who is aiming to avoid a colonoscopy, I secure their agreement to a subsequent colon exam if the stool test result is positive.

Gastroenterologists and physicians in those early years after FDA approval regarded positive Cologuard results very seriously. This was not yesterday’s stool smear for microscopic blood. Cologuard detected actual DNA fragments that could be derived from actual cancer or significant colon polyps.

Cologuard detects abnormal DNA fragments.

In those early years, when I was evaluating positive Cologuard patients, I was concerned that these colons had a high probability of harboring significant lesions. When I was doing colonoscopies on such patients and discovered no abnormalities, I would prolong the exam to re-examine various regions of the colon concerned that I had overlooked the important finding that caused the positive Cologuard. I often had lingering worry afterwards that I had missed a significant finding.

As the years went by, and the medical profession accumulated more experience, we learned that false positive Cologuard tests were common. Now, when these colon exams are normal, I recognize that this is a fortunate and common outcome.

Many positive Cologuard patients are often positive that they have cancer. The vast majority of them will have either a normal colonoscopy or benign polyps. So, while I still recommend that every individual with a positive Cologuard result pursue the joy of colonoscopy, the probability that they have an actual cancer is quite low.

Comments

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients? Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession? Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease. This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses. So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit. Physicians, after all, are members of...

Inpatient vs Outpatient Care;: Can Doctors Do Both?

Five years ago, I left hospital wards and emergency rooms behind and entered a new & improved medical practice model, at least for me. Since then, I only see patients for office consultations and procedures. Office medicine is a very different trade than hospital practice each having very distinct skill sets. If I were to return to the hospital now to see patients, it would be uncomfortable for me (and them) having not used these skills for years. Similarly, hospital-based doctors might find transitioning to an office practice to be clumsy and uncomfortable. While it might seem that a gastroenterologist or any medical specialist should be able to see patients in any location, this is not the case for most of us. Hospital medical issues are quite different from office medical complaints. Physicians, as in so many other occupations, need repetition in order to maintain high competency levels. There’s a reason, for example, that airline pi...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog