Skip to main content

Is Professional Football Too Dangerous?

I am a casual viewer of professional football.  I have come to realize that sports for many who live in Cleveland is a religion.  Many of these religious zealots who have invested so much time and devotion to the Cleveland Browns have become apostates after the what have been seasons of disappointment and failure.  Indeed, as of this writing I suspect that it is unlikely that the Browns will reach the Super Bowl this coming February 9th, but one can always hope for divine intervention.

But I am not writing to opine on the Browns’ performance.  For decades, I have been jarred by the violence of the game and the devastating injuries that routinely occur.  Indeed, one can expect players to be walked off or carted off the field in just about every game.  I treated a Cleveland Brown in his later years who had played for the team for 13 seasons in the 1950’s and 60’s.  I think every part of this body either hurt, didn’t work well or both.  He was a beautiful man and I miss him.  He never regretted his career choice.  Only two options were available to him – football or the factory.   Yes, I’m sure that players’ equipment is better today than it was decades ago, but the high risks of severe physical and mental permanent injury today are undeniable.

It's clear that fans and spectators enjoy the brute physicality of the game.  When the quarterback is pummeled to the ground, cheers erupt from the crowd and probably from living room couches across the country.  The violence is a feature, not a bug.  It seems that we humans have a primal attraction for viewing combat, recalling the gladiatorial contests in the Roman Colosseum 2000 years ago.  Wouldn’t this explain the appeal of boxing, professional wrestling or cage fighting?  Why do motorists slow down to view car wrecks?

I don’t think the NFL could fill up their stadiums if the game were changed to two-hand touch.

Did we really need scientific studies to conclude that smashing one’s helmeted head hundreds of times against the ground or into another helmeted player injures the brain?


If an athlete needs armor, then should the sport exist?

As I see it, if an activity requires a helmet and complete body armor, then it’s unsafe by definition and should be avoided.  Remember, this not merely facing a risk of serious injury but is practically a guarantee of suffering this outcome.

Do I think the game is likely to be modified to protect players’ health?   Of course not.  It is woven into society with a national fan base.  And the amount of money generated…

But if football were brand new on the scene today, and we knew that severe and permanent mental and physical trauma would affect so many players, would we allow it?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Inpatient vs Outpatient Care;: Can Doctors Do Both?

Five years ago, I left hospital wards and emergency rooms behind and entered a new & improved medical practice model, at least for me.  Since then, I only see patients for office consultations and procedures.  Office medicine is a very different trade than hospital practice each having very distinct skill sets.  If I were to return to the hospital now to see patients, it would be uncomfortable for me (and them) having not used these skills for years.  Similarly, hospital-based doctors might find transitioning to an office practice to be clumsy and uncomfortable. While it might seem that a gastroenterologist or any medical specialist should be able to see patients in any location, this is not the case for most of us.   Hospital medical issues are quite different from office medical complaints.   Physicians, as in so many other occupations, need repetition in order to maintain high competency levels.   There’s a reason, for example, that airline pi...