Skip to main content

Cologuard or Colonoscopy?

Many patients are aware of Cologuard as a colon cancer prevention option.  The appeal is obvious. One can submit a Cologuard stool test and forego the joys of colonoscopy.  Indeed, what motivates patients to select the easier option is not belief in the product but an opportunity to avoid a much less pleasant alternative.  This is analogous to how many of us vote in elections.  Rather than vote for a candidate we are often voting against another candidate.

                                      

Did you vote for or against a candidate?

Cologuard is much more sophisticated and expensive than the conventional stool testing for occult blood which has been standard fare for decades.  Cologuard will also detect microscopic blood in the stool but will also pick up abnormal DNA which could indicate the presence of a large precancerous polyp or even a cancer.  Hence, when a Cologuard test is positive, a subsequent colonoscopy is mandatory.  However, many positive Cologuard results are false positive results as the follow up colonoscopy is normal.  This is always greeted by relief by patients and the medical staff.

While Cologuard is convenient, it is clearly inferior to colonoscopy with regard to reducing colon cancer risk.  This is a fact.  However, the colonoscopy experience has many drawbacks as tens of millions of patients can attest.  Let’s break the process down.

A colonoscopy is ordered.

The patient is tasked to drink a large volume of a solution which yields a volcanic result. Many patients describe the cleansing process as horrendous.

Prep ingestion can result in dehydration particularly in elderly individuals.

Prep ingestion can alter electrolytes which rarely can have medical consequences.

The patient may need to miss at least a day of work.

A driver is necessary.

Anesthesia and the procedure have medical risks which are very low but > zero.

Even an expertly performed colonoscopy on a clean colon is not 100% accurate.

There is a recovery period with restrictions after the procedure.

I’ve performed tens of thousands of colonoscopies over the past few decades.  Indeed, I’ve also been on the receiving end of the scope and look forward to my next experience.  I believe in the procedure. But the inconvenience, risks, time required, joy of prep guzzling and missing work are substantial downsides to endure.  Hence, the appeal of Cologuard, an inferior medical option.  

Routine screening colonoscopy is going to disappear and may occur sooner than we think.  I expect that highly accurate non-invasive colon cancer screening tests using stool, blood or saliva will emerge which will be game changers.   Cologuard, while imperfect, heralds coming attractions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...