Skip to main content

Cologuard or Colonoscopy?

Many patients are aware of Cologuard as a colon cancer prevention option.  The appeal is obvious. One can submit a Cologuard stool test and forego the joys of colonoscopy.  Indeed, what motivates patients to select the easier option is not belief in the product but an opportunity to avoid a much less pleasant alternative.  This is analogous to how many of us vote in elections.  Rather than vote for a candidate we are often voting against another candidate.

                                      

Did you vote for or against a candidate?

Cologuard is much more sophisticated and expensive than the conventional stool testing for occult blood which has been standard fare for decades.  Cologuard will also detect microscopic blood in the stool but will also pick up abnormal DNA which could indicate the presence of a large precancerous polyp or even a cancer.  Hence, when a Cologuard test is positive, a subsequent colonoscopy is mandatory.  However, many positive Cologuard results are false positive results as the follow up colonoscopy is normal.  This is always greeted by relief by patients and the medical staff.

While Cologuard is convenient, it is clearly inferior to colonoscopy with regard to reducing colon cancer risk.  This is a fact.  However, the colonoscopy experience has many drawbacks as tens of millions of patients can attest.  Let’s break the process down.

A colonoscopy is ordered.

The patient is tasked to drink a large volume of a solution which yields a volcanic result. Many patients describe the cleansing process as horrendous.

Prep ingestion can result in dehydration particularly in elderly individuals.

Prep ingestion can alter electrolytes which rarely can have medical consequences.

The patient may need to miss at least a day of work.

A driver is necessary.

Anesthesia and the procedure have medical risks which are very low but > zero.

Even an expertly performed colonoscopy on a clean colon is not 100% accurate.

There is a recovery period with restrictions after the procedure.

I’ve performed tens of thousands of colonoscopies over the past few decades.  Indeed, I’ve also been on the receiving end of the scope and look forward to my next experience.  I believe in the procedure. But the inconvenience, risks, time required, joy of prep guzzling and missing work are substantial downsides to endure.  Hence, the appeal of Cologuard, an inferior medical option.  

Routine screening colonoscopy is going to disappear and may occur sooner than we think.  I expect that highly accurate non-invasive colon cancer screening tests using stool, blood or saliva will emerge which will be game changers.   Cologuard, while imperfect, heralds coming attractions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Inpatient vs Outpatient Care;: Can Doctors Do Both?

Five years ago, I left hospital wards and emergency rooms behind and entered a new & improved medical practice model, at least for me.  Since then, I only see patients for office consultations and procedures.  Office medicine is a very different trade than hospital practice each having very distinct skill sets.  If I were to return to the hospital now to see patients, it would be uncomfortable for me (and them) having not used these skills for years.  Similarly, hospital-based doctors might find transitioning to an office practice to be clumsy and uncomfortable. While it might seem that a gastroenterologist or any medical specialist should be able to see patients in any location, this is not the case for most of us.   Hospital medical issues are quite different from office medical complaints.   Physicians, as in so many other occupations, need repetition in order to maintain high competency levels.   There’s a reason, for example, that airline pi...