Skip to main content

Justifying Murder of United Healthcare CEO

Recently, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare was gunned down in a brazen and calculated act by a murderer. The alleged killer had a life of privilege with top drawer education.  He was the valedictorian of his high school class.  We still do not know the reasons underlying his radicalization against the health care establishment.

It has been astonishing to hear and read many voices expressing sympathy and understanding for this heinous act.  The enemy of my enemy is my friend.  Really?  It is galling that some out there believe that acting against a health insurance executive should be considered a mitigating factor in a murder. 

Indeed, a U.S. senator commenting on the murder decried violence but then added that ‘people can be pushed only so far’.   Public outrage to this forced her to do some clean up a day later, but her initial instincts and analysis remain in plain sight.


The senator needed to 'clarify' her initial remarks.


If a man shoots up the owner of a liquor store because he is rabidly against alcoholism, does this lessen the crime or even deserve any consideration?  Perhaps, his lawyer might argue that it does, which I understand, but the rest of us should remain more clear-eyed.  How does this hypothetical headline grab you?  Man guns down flight attendant after flight delay and loss of luggage.   I could offer many other similar examples and so could you.

In addition, the alleged assailant’s attractive physical appearance is also frequently mentioned.  Please explain to me the relevance of this.

I don’t think that the excesses and abuses of the health insurance company should even be mentioned in the same sentence, paragraph, news article or commentary unless it is to reject this juxtaposition with the crime committed.   If we wish to take this industry to task, then there are separate and appropriate forums to do so.

This blog has nearly 900 posts many of which are critical of insurance companies, the health care system and medical professionals including myself.  I will continue doing so.   Indeed, this is the raison d’etre of this blog which has been percolating weekly for over 15 years. 

We cannot allow the motivations of a deranged criminal to sanitize a violent act.  Again, I expect that argument might go forth in a court of law, but those of us who serve on the ‘jury’ in the court of public opinion might judge the matter differently.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) Durin...