Skip to main content

Fecal Incontinence - The Silent Affliction

Gastroenterologists are equipped to assist folks with fecal incontinence (FI) – an awful symptom for reasons that need not be explained.  While many of these individuals experience leakage only occasionally, the fear of an impending episode is ever present.  They leave home wondering if this will be a day when they will experience a lapse in control.  Many remain at home or curtail social activities because of fear and anxiety.

So, while the condition is not life threatening, it is an assault on an individual’s quality of life.

It’s more common in women and the elderly and is associated with a host of medical conditions.  Fecal incontinence is extremely common in extended care facilities which can result in medical consequences.

This post is not to discuss the diagnosis and treatment of this condition.  Indeed, this blog is a medical commentary site, not an ‘ask a doctor’ site.

Here’s the point of this post.  More often than not, individuals suffering from fecal incontinence do not volunteer this complaint to their doctors, even if their physician is a gastroenterologist.  Most of them cannot overcome the shame and stigma of this symptom.  The closest many of them get is to relate their history of ‘diarrhea’.  The physician needs to ask directly if there has been any leakage or accidents.  At that point, the incontinent patient will readily affirm their symptom and are often relieved that the ice has been broken and their issue will be addressed. 


Incontinent patients often remain silent.

I have no doubt that many of my patients are suffering from FI silently.  When a 45-year-old sees me for heartburn, inquiring about fecal leakage is not included in my routine questioning.  Unless these patients indicate the presence of this symptom during an interview with my staff preceding the visit, then I will not be aware of the issue.  It’s also possible that a patient with FI would deny the symptom if questioned directly.

The larger point is that patients may have a variety of important issues that they won’t volunteer to health care professionals.  Psychiatric illnesses, alcoholism and addiction, family stress, financial distress or a lurking fear that a malignancy may be present are among issues that patients may not actively share. If we physicians have established rapport and earned trust, and we ask specific and direct questions, then we may discover what’s really on our patients’ minds.

 

 

Comments

  1. Just an FYI - you need to add the letter "I" between the "L" and "C" in affliction. Good read!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was just a test to see how careful my readers are! Thank you! MK

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...