Ozempic for Weight Loss - Safe for Indefinite Use?

Have you ever heard of a drug called Ozempic? Just kidding. As we all know, this medicine and numerous related drugs are the rage. It is classified as a GLP-1 drug. The percentage of my patients who are taking these drugs is steadily rising. Of course, initially Ozempic’s purpose was in diabetic management. Once it was discovered that weight loss was a ‘side-effect’, a new therapeutic mission was discovered. Indeed, public demand to use this medicine off-label for weight loss has risen sharply. Currently, there are two GLP-1 agonist medicines that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has approved for obesity treatment. I can promise you that pharmaceutical R & D on similar and next-generation weight loss pharmaceuticals is supercharged. Why the interest?

There is an obesity epidemic in America.
The medical, financial and societal consequences of obesity are staggering.
Diet and exercise options are insufficiently effective for most individuals.
Prior weight loss medications were only modestly effective and had some concerning adverse reaction potential.
The market for an effective weight loss treatment is monumental. And the market expands as new medical uses or new treatment targets develop. To illustrate, if you lower the normal level of cholesterol or blood pressure, then more folks will need drugs. Or if these drugs are found to provide medical benefits for other conditions, then drug usage will rise.

Bariatric surgery, including gastric bypass and related procedures, is obviously a less attractive option than an effective pill or a weekly injection. Indeed, bariatric surgeons may find that they have more free time these days than they used to.

Are Ozempic Patients on a Slow Moving Runaway Train?

GLP-1 medicines and those that will follow appear to be game-changers. Curiously, we do not fully understand how they work. They do seem to curb appetite and slow down the digestive system making users feel full sooner.

Of course, there are side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. But might there be unknown long-term effects of these drugs which must be taken indefinitely? Will we look back years from now and wonder why so many of us drank the Kool Aid with enthusiasm? I am just speculating here, but it does seem to me that there has been a collective rush to judgment before the facts have come in. Risk-benefit analysis should assume greater importance for a medicine that may be taken for several decades, particularly when we do not fully grasp how it works.

What do you think? Are these patients riding smoothly on the Ozempic Express or might they be on board a lumbering runaway train?

Comments

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change. I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday. I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend. And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me. It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career. It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves. As some readers know, my current employed position has been a dream job for me. Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally. My partner and I ran the business. Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades. On an on-call night, if I slept through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery. And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good? Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it. While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession. Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves? Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students. I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog