Ozempic for Weight Loss - Safe for Indefinite Use?

Have you ever heard of a drug called Ozempic? Just kidding. As we all know, this medicine and numerous related drugs are the rage. It is classified as a GLP-1 drug. The percentage of my patients who are taking these drugs is steadily rising. Of course, initially Ozempic’s purpose was in diabetic management. Once it was discovered that weight loss was a ‘side-effect’, a new therapeutic mission was discovered. Indeed, public demand to use this medicine off-label for weight loss has risen sharply. Currently, there are two GLP-1 agonist medicines that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has approved for obesity treatment. I can promise you that pharmaceutical R & D on similar and next-generation weight loss pharmaceuticals is supercharged. Why the interest?

There is an obesity epidemic in America.
The medical, financial and societal consequences of obesity are staggering.
Diet and exercise options are insufficiently effective for most individuals.
Prior weight loss medications were only modestly effective and had some concerning adverse reaction potential.
The market for an effective weight loss treatment is monumental. And the market expands as new medical uses or new treatment targets develop. To illustrate, if you lower the normal level of cholesterol or blood pressure, then more folks will need drugs. Or if these drugs are found to provide medical benefits for other conditions, then drug usage will rise.

Bariatric surgery, including gastric bypass and related procedures, is obviously a less attractive option than an effective pill or a weekly injection. Indeed, bariatric surgeons may find that they have more free time these days than they used to.

Are Ozempic Patients on a Slow Moving Runaway Train?

GLP-1 medicines and those that will follow appear to be game-changers. Curiously, we do not fully understand how they work. They do seem to curb appetite and slow down the digestive system making users feel full sooner.

Of course, there are side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. But might there be unknown long-term effects of these drugs which must be taken indefinitely? Will we look back years from now and wonder why so many of us drank the Kool Aid with enthusiasm? I am just speculating here, but it does seem to me that there has been a collective rush to judgment before the facts have come in. Risk-benefit analysis should assume greater importance for a medicine that may be taken for several decades, particularly when we do not fully grasp how it works.

What do you think? Are these patients riding smoothly on the Ozempic Express or might they be on board a lumbering runaway train?

Comments

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and studying, two longstanding personal pleasures, could be ext

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients? Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession? Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease. This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses. So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit. Physicians, after all, are members of the human species. A pulmon

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog