Skip to main content

Are Probiotics Safe and Effective?

Recently, I stated that probiotics are marketed and sold free from the strict scrutiny of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight that our prescription drugs routinely undergo.  And this is just how these companies want it.  Trust me, if probiotics had to endure the same vetting process that actual drugs go through, most of them would be snuffed out along the way.

Here’s a simplified glimpse of how the system works.


Yo ho, hey hey, keep away from the FDA!

Many probiotics are classified by the FDA as dietary supplements, rather than drugs.  Indeed, it is this classification that allows the industry to thrive.  The FDA regulates supplements much more leniently than they do conventional prescription drugs that must endure years of intensive vetting and successive clinical trials. The drug approval process is so rigorous that most drug candidates will not reach the finish line.  The FDA maintains high standards for safety and efficacy.  However, because probiotics are not drugs, they do not need to establish that they are effective.  This is why when you see or hear them advertised, there is always the disclaimer that the supplement is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.  Yet, the ads use coded language that strongly suggests that these supplements do in fact treat diseases.  Phrases such as ‘good for bone health’ or is ‘good for digestion’  or 'improves memory and recall', sound to most of us like they are actual treatments for these diseases.

And this regulatory system for supplements is their Holy Grail.  They are making billions of dollars selling zillions of bacteria without ever having to prove that they actually work.   Not a bad business model, eh?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary