Skip to main content

When Should Your Doctor Refer for a Second Opinion?

As a gastroenterologist (GI), I am regarded by primary care physicians and other medical professional as having special expertise in digestive diseases.  Indeed, I have highly specialized training in digestive maladies and function.  I regard myself as a GI generalist, that is a practitioner who treats the full array of digestive conditions.  Over the past decades, I have treated patients with diseases of the small and large bowel, stomach, and esophagus issues and pancreatic liver and gallbladder disorders.  And I have had a full endoscopy practice – the tools of the GI trade.  One of the appeals of being a GI Gen is that I see a wide and diverse span of medical conditions.  In a single week, I may address heartburn and ulcers. Crohn’s disease, hepatitis, bowel changes, internal bleeding, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and hemorrhoids.  I enjoy the variety.  



GI Generalists Cover a Lot of Ground!

During most of my career, I seldom referred patients to other gastroenterologists for advice.  But, whenever I needed help, I asked for it. There were instances when I was unsure of a diagnosis or my proposed treatment was not effective.  If this occurred, and I harbored doubt or concern,  I arranged for another opinion.  Obviously, judgment and common sense must be relied upon in this process.  If I can’t explain a patient’s symptom that is clearly a benign issue, I may not advise another GI opinion to assess it, unless the patient requests it. General gastroenterologists see thousands of patients each year, yet only a small fraction of them are referred out for additional GI advice.  Knowing when to solicit another medical opinion is an important and necessary skill for every medical professional.

I now work for an internationally renowned medical organization that is based in Cleveland.  I’ll leave it to my reader-sleuths to divine its identity.  There are well over a hundred gastroenterologists on staff.  There are scores of GI generalists like me but also superspecialist GI’s who focus on very narrow niches within the specialty.  There are physicians who specialize in the esophagus or the pancreas or the liver, for example.  There are experts in celiac disease and gluten disorders.  There are doctors whose practices are devoted to various forms of colitis.  There are also physicians who spend most of their times performing futuristic and complex endoscopic procedures. 

How has this impacted me?  The availability of superspecialist GI talent means that with every patient I see, there are doctors on staff who are more knowledgeable and experienced than I am in addressing the medical issue.  This is a humbling realization.  Should I be referring every patient to the downtown experts changing my role from physician to a triage functionary?  Of course not.  In any profession or occupation, one can perform at a high level of excellence even if there are colleagues nearby who have stronger credentials.  Imagine if we insisted upon seeing the absolute best physician, electrician, attorney, house painter, accountant, pet groomer, hair stylist, teacher or photographer?  The system would collapse.  First of all, good luck agreeing on who is, in fact, the very best.  Secondly, when we hire a professional or a tradesman, we are seeking competence, fairness, and integrity all of which may be below the apex of the reputational pyramid. 

Comments

  1. My guess is that you usually refer when you need a procedure that you don’t do such as endoscopic Ultrasound or ERCP.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary