Skip to main content

What do Medical Consultants Do?

I am a gastroenterologist.  Like most medical specialists, most of the patients I see are referred to me by other medical professionals.  In this role, I am serving as a consultant.  Similarly, when a specialist is asked to see a hospitalized patient by the attending physician, the requested doctor will be serving in a consultant role.

Consultants are recruited when the medical team or an individual practitioner feels that additional knowledge and experience is necessary.  Consider three hypothetical scenarios.

A patient has not responded to a standard course of antibiotics.  The attending physician asks an infectious disease physician to make recommendations.

A primary care physician is uncertain if the abnormal chest x-ray is heart failure or pneumonia.  The doctor calls in a cardiologist to assist.

A patient with colitis comes to an emergency room with worsening diarrhea after starting a new medicine.  The ER physician is uncertain if the patient’s diarrhea is a side-effect of medication or is a worsening of the underlying illness.  A gastroenterologist is consulted to evaluate the situation.


Not sure what this rash is.  Let's have a dermatologist consult on the case.

The consultant’s role is to offer recommendations to the patient and to the referring physician - not to take over the case which often occurs. The consultant's role is advisory.  For example, a surgical consultant may advise an operation, but the patient’s doctor of many years and the patient may have good reasons to prefer a conservative approach. Obviously, there should be robust communication among the consultant, the patient and relevant members of the care team.  In theory, the doctor in charge, not the consultant, synthesizes the advice from one or more consultants and then makes recommendations to the patient, who has the ultimate authority.  

Consultants like me prefer when our opinion is sought on a specific medical question.  Not only does this allow us to focus more narrowly, but it also indicates that the referring physician has given thought to the medical situation.  Consider these 2 hypothetical consultation requests.

Please see my patient who has had repeated attacks of upper abdominal pain with vomiting.  The symptoms persisted despite taking medication for ulcers.  Labs and a CAT scan from a recent ER visit were normal.   Even though a gallbladder test was negative, I still wonder if the gallbladder is the culprit. 

OR

See patient with stomach pain.

There are instances when a patient referred to me doesn’t know the reason why.  And there have been times when the chart does not enlighten me on why a consult is being requested.

Throughout my career, nursing home residents have been brought to my office accompanied by aides who does not know them and bring paperwork that does not specify a reason for the visit.  Not medicine's finest hour.

In a perfect world, which is not our world, all medical consultation requests would be sufficiently detailed.  I’m not faulting my referring colleagues for how consultations are issued.  Physicians are incredibly overworked and overstretched.  And their burdens are mounting.  Typical days are filled with patient visits, phone calls, portal messages, ‘paperwork’ on the computer, refills, covering for vacationing colleagues, worry over sick patients, adding on patients to the schedule, seemingly endless e-mails and running behind in the office.  Is it any wonder why their consult request communications might be abbreviated?  

Doctors need our own consultants to decompress us and stave off burn out.  Does such a professional exist?  


 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary