Skip to main content

Medical Marijauna Avoids FDA Scrutiny

Many of my patients are using medical or recreational marijuana to ease symptoms that do not respond well to conventional medical treatments. I understand this.  I have already opined on this blog that I believe that the medical evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of medical marijuana is rather thin, very different from the strict standards that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relies upon in assessing prescription drugs and medical devices.  Moreover, here in Ohio and elsewhere, our legislature is deeply involved in determining which medical conditions are eligible for medical marijuana treatment, a role that I believe should be handled exclusively by medical professionals and appropriate federal government agencies, such as the FDA.  Politicians should leave this to the professionals. How can you argue otherwise?

I am employed by Cleveland’s largest health care organization which has national and international reach. The organization will not permit any caregiver to participate in the medical marijuana program with patients.  One could argue that they are denying their patients legitimate medical care that other Ohioans routinely receive.  However, they, like me, are skeptical of the safety and efficacy data as well as the lack of uniformity in the various forms of medical marijuana and product differences among dispensaries – all valid points.   Moreover, since employee marijuana use is prohibited by my employer, it would be inconsistent and ludicrous if I were permitted to recommend medical marijuana to my patients but was forbidden to use it personally. 


The FDA states there is no evidence that 
medical marijuana is safe and effective for any condition.


We must also recognize that marijuana purchase and use remain illegal on the federal level.  The feds currently classify it as a Schedule 1 substance, along with heroin and LSD.  While I’m not a pharmacologist, it does seem to me that marijuana doesn’t belong on this list.  I predict that in time the feds will legalize medical marijuana as has occurred in various states.  I also predict that the medical marijuana industry, similar to the probiotic industry, will not want to be subjected to the FDA’s testing requirements for obvious reasons.  If you really believed in your product’s performance, and wanted to reassure and protect the public, then wouldn’t you demand FDA oversight?  What conclusion would you draw if a manufacturer of a medical treatment or any product angled to avoid scientific testing? 

My own view is that the forces that have propelled medical (and recreational) marijuana into the marketplace are more economic than medical.  There is a fortune to be made in this growing industry that has an expanding national market base.  And, every municipality or state is hungry for additional tax dollars.

So here in Ohio, my state gives me the green light to ingest medical marijuana, my employer says no for me or my patients and the feds are lurking in the background maintaining that marijuana use is a crime!  How’s that for consistency and clarity?

Comments

  1. This marijuana stuff is pure crap! I have a family member that called some "doctor" on the phone and said she has fibromyalgia and for a large fee received a "license" for "medical" marijuana! "Someone" is making money off these "licenses"! I have another family member with RA that vapes it daily!!! I'm getting real tired of smelling "skunk" smell all over the stores and in cars in the parking lot and even when someone pulls right up next to you at a light!!!! I think it is certainly a gateway drug and very addictive!! I hope somehow they can stop the train!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary