Skip to main content

Medical Marijauna Avoids FDA Scrutiny

Many of my patients are using medical or recreational marijuana to ease symptoms that do not respond well to conventional medical treatments. I understand this.  I have already opined on this blog that I believe that the medical evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of medical marijuana is rather thin, very different from the strict standards that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relies upon in assessing prescription drugs and medical devices.  Moreover, here in Ohio and elsewhere, our legislature is deeply involved in determining which medical conditions are eligible for medical marijuana treatment, a role that I believe should be handled exclusively by medical professionals and appropriate federal government agencies, such as the FDA.  Politicians should leave this to the professionals. How can you argue otherwise?

I am employed by Cleveland’s largest health care organization which has national and international reach. The organization will not permit any caregiver to participate in the medical marijuana program with patients.  One could argue that they are denying their patients legitimate medical care that other Ohioans routinely receive.  However, they, like me, are skeptical of the safety and efficacy data as well as the lack of uniformity in the various forms of medical marijuana and product differences among dispensaries – all valid points.   Moreover, since employee marijuana use is prohibited by my employer, it would be inconsistent and ludicrous if I were permitted to recommend medical marijuana to my patients but was forbidden to use it personally. 


The FDA states there is no evidence that 
medical marijuana is safe and effective for any condition.


We must also recognize that marijuana purchase and use remain illegal on the federal level.  The feds currently classify it as a Schedule 1 substance, along with heroin and LSD.  While I’m not a pharmacologist, it does seem to me that marijuana doesn’t belong on this list.  I predict that in time the feds will legalize medical marijuana as has occurred in various states.  I also predict that the medical marijuana industry, similar to the probiotic industry, will not want to be subjected to the FDA’s testing requirements for obvious reasons.  If you really believed in your product’s performance, and wanted to reassure and protect the public, then wouldn’t you demand FDA oversight?  What conclusion would you draw if a manufacturer of a medical treatment or any product angled to avoid scientific testing? 

My own view is that the forces that have propelled medical (and recreational) marijuana into the marketplace are more economic than medical.  There is a fortune to be made in this growing industry that has an expanding national market base.  And, every municipality or state is hungry for additional tax dollars.

So here in Ohio, my state gives me the green light to ingest medical marijuana, my employer says no for me or my patients and the feds are lurking in the background maintaining that marijuana use is a crime!  How’s that for consistency and clarity?

Comments

  1. This marijuana stuff is pure crap! I have a family member that called some "doctor" on the phone and said she has fibromyalgia and for a large fee received a "license" for "medical" marijuana! "Someone" is making money off these "licenses"! I have another family member with RA that vapes it daily!!! I'm getting real tired of smelling "skunk" smell all over the stores and in cars in the parking lot and even when someone pulls right up next to you at a light!!!! I think it is certainly a gateway drug and very addictive!! I hope somehow they can stop the train!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...