Skip to main content

Can I Trust my Doctor?

We all recall President Reagan’s adage, trust but verify, with regard to the then Soviet Union.  President Reagan’s choice of words indicated that trust could not be assumed.  I challenge this notion as I feel that to trust another person, an organization or even a country that trust must be assumed to exist.  That’s what trust means.  Conversely, if one has to verify its presence, then true trust is clearly not there.  If a spouse, for example, hires a private investigator to prove that his or her partner is behaving honorably, is trust present?

I think that overall the public trusts their doctors, although they are wary about the medical profession writ large.  The public may view their physicians in the same way that it views politicians – they see systemic dysfunction and self-interest in both professions but folks give higher integrity marks to their personal doctor or representative.  Often, patients who I know have confidence in me voice criticisms over various frustrating aspects of the medical world including billing absurdities, poor physician access, waiting times in emergency rooms, lackluster bedside manners, costs of pharmaceuticals, the reality that medicine is a business and the sense that they are outmatched in an unfair fight. 

How much trust can a patient have in a system that won’t cover a drug that they need to get well?

There is a dichotomy between a strong bond between most patients and their doctors and a deep skepticism the public has with the medical-industrial complex.  I understand this both as a physician and when I have been a patient.  If medicine has truly morphed into a business, can we expect it to behave reliably as a professional calling?  I suggest that readers review the very brief fable of the Frog and the Scorpion which illustrates my stinging point very well.  I’m not saying that the profession cannot behave nobly, only that there are forces present opposing this. 


"It's my nature."

If trust between medical professionals and patients erodes, then the doctor-patient relationship is fractured and optimal medical care may no longer be possible.  A patient needs to know that when medical advice is offered, that the only consideration is the patient’s welfare.  I still have patients query me from time to time if the reason I am counseling against a diagnostic test is to conform with insurance company policy.  And patients need to be truthful with us.  If physicians are misled about addiction issues or if patients are taking their medicines as prescribed, then the medical recommendations may be wrong.  Tell the truth.

Overall, I think the health of the doctor-patient relationship is intact, but like any relationship, it needs to be nurtured and protected.  Each side has a responsibility to maintain it.  If one side is falling short, then the partner needs to call him or her out to restore the equilibrium.  That’s how a trusting relationship stays strong.

 

Comments

  1. This was an excellent blog. I do trust my doctors. I have had the good fortune of seeing doctors who chose the profession for all of the right reasons. My issues are with the complex medical industry and the insurance industry. I am so grateful for the doctors who must have to deal with the micro managing of those whose first concern is profit. Thank you for your constant moral compass.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @anonymous, thanks so much for your kind words. I believe that most physicians have entered the profession for the right reasons. One of many challenges facing them and me is to resist various external forces and influences that confront us along the way that serves to distract us from our healing missions. I hope that you will visit the blog again.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) Durin...