Skip to main content

When Should I Get a Second Opinion?

Image
By

 Now that I am employed by a colossal medical center whose reach extends internationally, many patients land on my schedule seeking a 2nd, 3rd or even a 4th opinion on recalcitrant and unexplained digestive issues. Many of these patients travel from neighboring states coming with the hope that yet another gastroenterologist will crack the code of their illness.  Obviously, any patient who seeks another medical opinion is already dissatisfied, hence the reason for seeking additional advice..  Here is a sampling of some reasons why patients solicit or are sent for new medical opinions.

  • Persistent symptoms
  • Search for an explanatory diagnosis for unexplained symptoms.
  • Quality check to verify that the original doctor’s advice is correct.
  • Encouragement of family or close friends to seek another opinion.
  • Dissatisfaction with the doctor’s bedside manner.
  • Friction with the office staff or the billing personnel.
  • Office schedule of original doctor is booked out for months.
  • Fear that a serious diagnosis has been missed.
  • Wanting to be told that they are not crazy.

Sometimes, obtaining a new medical opinion is an excellent idea.  But second opinions can also confuse and bewilder rather than clarify a medical situation – a point not appreciated by most patients and families.  Remember that medicine is an art where excellent physicians evaluating identical medical circumstances might offer different advice.  In medical conferences that occur every day throughout the country, medical luminaries discussing a case may have wildly different views on how to proceed.  So, when your 2nd opinion doctor offers new advice, it may not be better advice, it may just be different.  Both sets of advice may be rationale and defensible.   I recognize that when different advice is suggested, it reinforces to the patient the wisdom of having sought a new opinion.  “I knew my first doctor was wrong.  The new doctor suggested something entirely different!”   Keep in mind that a 2nd opinion physician also knows the patient was unhappy with the first doctor’s advice making it more likely that a new path forward will be suggested.  Will the new route truly lead the patient forward?  Hard to say.


The Second Opinion World May Leave You Lost.

Is it possible that several capable specialists have missed a diagnosis?  Of course, but it is unlikely.  Medicine never reaches 100% certainty.  How much testing would you consent to or pay for a few additional percentage points of certainty? 

If I am the 3rd or 4th opinion on a patient who has been thoroughly and repeated evaluated, should I simply pile on more testing?  Doctors can always find another test or two that wasn’t done.  Or, should we counsel these patients that it does not appear that the specialty of gastroenterology holds the solution to their frustrating quagmire.  How many months or years should any of us proceed in the same direction without making progress?  For many of these patients, choosing a new direction makes more sense to me.  There is a huge reservoir of healing pathways available ranging from conventional medicine to complimentary medicine with much in between.  While I may not know the precise pathway to recommend, I try to open the patient and myself to new possibilities.  This conversation  requires a very openminded patient.

If the direction you're traveling never reaches the destination, isn't it time to try a different route?

Labels:

Comments

  1. Elliot DavidsonOctober 4, 2023 at 1:10 PM

    Very insightful as usual but even better you have given me an idea for a podcast. How to choose the right consultant the first time! As per my frequent advice, ask your PCP! Stay tuned.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

By
Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe
44 comments
Read more

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

By
Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today
36 comments
Read more

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

By
Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary
6 comments
Read more