Skip to main content

Drug and Medication Side Effects May Stump Physician Detectives!

One of the conundrums in medical practice is to determine if a medication is causing a side effect.  Sometimes, this issue is very straightforward.  A new medicine is prescribed.  Three days later, the patient develops a new symptom of constipation.  The medicine is stopped and the bowel pattern normalizes.  Most of us would agree that the evidence that the medicine was responsible for the bowel change is beyond a reasonable doubt.

The above is a textbook example of a side effect, but alas, patients often have not read the textbook.  Consider a patient having diarrhea from colitis.  The gastroenterologist prescribes an appropriate medication.  Two weeks later, the patient contacts the doctor to report that his diarrhea has worsened.  Although diarrhea is among the long list of potential side effects of the medicine, might the increased diarrhea simply be from his underlying colitis?


It's 'alimentary', my dear Watson!

I have seen many examples of patients who come to me with what seems to be good evidence that a medicine has caused a new and unwelcome symptom.  Yet, when I research the drug, I do not see this particular side effect listed.  (This is hard to believe since it seems that every drug has a hundred or so side effects listed!)  In this case, do I accept that the new symptom is medication induced or did it arise coincidentally?   Do I reassure the patient that the medicine is not responsible?  Do I stop the drug?  Should I prescribe a new medicine to attack the ‘side effect’? 

Many of our patients suffer from various chronic diseases and are on multiple medications.  Many of these folks have ongoing symptoms including nausea, abdominal distress, joint pains, mood disorders, bowel disturbances, fatigue and headaches.  The various symptoms can wax and wane. Who can tell to the extent that any of these symptoms are caused by one or more of the medicines?  And, if patients are swallowing a pile of medicines each day, there is a chance that one or two of them may be interacting with others resulting in side effects. 

Determining if a symptom is a side effect often requires the sleuthing skill of Sherlock Holmes.     Come Watson, come! He cried. The game is afoot. 

 

 

Comments

  1. Excellent points, Michael. I teach students and residents that if patients are having a symptom and are taking a med (RX or OTC) we should consider an adverse drug reaction in the differential early. Often that is the cause!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...