Skip to main content

Will Artificial Intelligence Replace Doctors?

Years from now, the notion of simple telemedicine will seem quaint.  Keep in mind that as recently as a decade ago, most physicians would have denied that telemedicine could ever play a role in the medical profession. Physicians would have argued that this would dismantle the fundamental unit of medical care – the in-person office visit.

Physicians would have rigidly maintained that they had to be face-to-face with their patients.  Doctors would need to observe their demeanor and body language and other non-verbal signals.  The physician would need to perform a physical examination to discover additional clues that might help to explain the patient’s symptoms.  Indeed, medical professionals and others have expressed that the act of touching itself served as a bonding experience between patients and their doctors.  The very definition of ‘bedside manners’ implies that the patient and physician are in the same location.

Today, there are physicians who practice telemedicine exclusively.  Moreover, this new paradigm is accepted both by medical professionals and the public who have come to value other priorities such as convenience and efficiency.  Many physicians have also come to accept that medical quality can be maintained during most virtual visits, although exceptions exist.

What will the practice of medicine look like ten years from now?  It may be deeper and farther into the technoverse than we can imagine today.

'Look Ma, no Hands!' 
Won't need this years from now.

The patient may relate symptoms from home to an artificial intelligence (AI) platform and send over a scanned body image or results of a saliva specimen or biometric information which will contain thousands of data points for analysis.   Leading diagnostic considerations will be generated in seconds along with a proposed algorithm for proceeding with diagnostic testing, which may be able to be conducted at that very moment using technical accessories that would make one of today’s Apple Watch seem like an abacus.  And therapeutics then may be light years beyond picking up a one-size-fits-all prescription at a pharmacy.  If AI determines that a patient has appendicitis, then a driverless car will arrive in minutes to transport the patient to a facility where surgery can proceed robotically under AI guidance with no human at the controls.  If you think this is fanciful, would you have believed 10 years ago that cars and trucks would be able to be operated in a driverless fashion?

This science fiction prophecy transcends medicine.  Indeed, nearly all professions and trades will be affected.  How important will actual humans be in our lives?  I acknowledge that the quality of many of the functions and activities currently done by members of the human species will improve.  But the overall quality of our lives – our humanity – may fare differently.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...