Skip to main content

Will Artificial Intelligence Replace Doctors?

Years from now, the notion of simple telemedicine will seem quaint.  Keep in mind that as recently as a decade ago, most physicians would have denied that telemedicine could ever play a role in the medical profession. Physicians would have argued that this would dismantle the fundamental unit of medical care – the in-person office visit.

Physicians would have rigidly maintained that they had to be face-to-face with their patients.  Doctors would need to observe their demeanor and body language and other non-verbal signals.  The physician would need to perform a physical examination to discover additional clues that might help to explain the patient’s symptoms.  Indeed, medical professionals and others have expressed that the act of touching itself served as a bonding experience between patients and their doctors.  The very definition of ‘bedside manners’ implies that the patient and physician are in the same location.

Today, there are physicians who practice telemedicine exclusively.  Moreover, this new paradigm is accepted both by medical professionals and the public who have come to value other priorities such as convenience and efficiency.  Many physicians have also come to accept that medical quality can be maintained during most virtual visits, although exceptions exist.

What will the practice of medicine look like ten years from now?  It may be deeper and farther into the technoverse than we can imagine today.

'Look Ma, no Hands!' 
Won't need this years from now.

The patient may relate symptoms from home to an artificial intelligence (AI) platform and send over a scanned body image or results of a saliva specimen or biometric information which will contain thousands of data points for analysis.   Leading diagnostic considerations will be generated in seconds along with a proposed algorithm for proceeding with diagnostic testing, which may be able to be conducted at that very moment using technical accessories that would make one of today’s Apple Watch seem like an abacus.  And therapeutics then may be light years beyond picking up a one-size-fits-all prescription at a pharmacy.  If AI determines that a patient has appendicitis, then a driverless car will arrive in minutes to transport the patient to a facility where surgery can proceed robotically under AI guidance with no human at the controls.  If you think this is fanciful, would you have believed 10 years ago that cars and trucks would be able to be operated in a driverless fashion?

This science fiction prophecy transcends medicine.  Indeed, nearly all professions and trades will be affected.  How important will actual humans be in our lives?  I acknowledge that the quality of many of the functions and activities currently done by members of the human species will improve.  But the overall quality of our lives – our humanity – may fare differently.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary