Skip to main content

Health Care Coverage in the Future

When we are purchasing a product or a service, the marketplace offers us many choices.  Competing wares may have different quality and cost levels.  We experience this if we are renting a car, booking a hotel, hiring an attorney, selecting a restaurant or buying a musical instrument.  All guitars, for example, are not equal.

When we decide to purchase at a certain quality and price point, we must accept the realities of this transaction.  We should not purchase a Chevy, for example, and expect a Cadillac experience. 

I realize that price and quality may not follow a linear path.  Just because something costs more doesn’t mean it’s better.  There are wrinkles in the marketplace.  Budget hotels, for example, often provide guests with free breakfast free parking and free wifi while high end stodgy hotels gouge guests with resort fees (please explain to me what this is), insane parking charges and crazy minibar prices on top of their exorbitant room rates. 

The task is to match an item’s price and quality with a consumer’s need. 


I Wish Everyone had Cadillac Care

As a physician, I have seen countless examples over the years of folks suffering from limitations in insurance coverage with regard to drug coverage or high deductibles – consequences of cheaper premiums.  (I realize that the medical insurance example is quite complex and very often people either have no choice with regard to their insurance product or simply cannot afford better coverage.)

There is a reason that inexpensive health insurance is inexpensive.  It means your benefits will be limited, your choice of doctors may be restricted, you may need a referral to see a specialist or that you will have to satisfy a high deductible before your coverage kicks in.  These plans work well if you are not planning on getting sick.  However, many events in life including illness can arrive uninvited and unexpectedly 

Health care coverage will be a different entity years from now.  What will the new coverage model look like?  Single payer?  Government controlled?  Free market based?  I predict that health care delivery will become a global phenomenon. Telemedicine already allows patients to consult with physicians in other countries.  Surgeons will be able to operate on patients robotically thousands of miles away, and sooner than we may think.  Health coverage may very well cross international boundaries.  The complexity of this notion is mind boggling and there will be resistance as always occurs when a reform creates winners and losers. Disruption is very disruptive.

Would every individual have equal access to the same level of health care if the industry is globalized?  I doubt it considering how much inequity of opportunity and outcome is built into our own society and the world.  There will be tiers of service and the rich will have access to better health care much as they now enjoy superior legal and financial advice, better leisure activities and more comfortable housing. 

I believe everyone has a right to health care but this does not mean that everyone must receive the same level of care.  Should a person who can afford better health care be prevented from buying it?

 

 

 

Comments

  1. @Tel U, thanks for your thoughtful comment. Personal privacy will be under threat, for sure. How do I know this? Because it already is. Not a week goes by that we are not told of some major breach of our data. Businesses are anxious that they may be the next target of ransomware. Who knows what future forms and capabilities nefarious actors will launch? Technological development will not be restricted to those who aim to make the world better.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary