Skip to main content

Health Care Coverage in the Future

When we are purchasing a product or a service, the marketplace offers us many choices.  Competing wares may have different quality and cost levels.  We experience this if we are renting a car, booking a hotel, hiring an attorney, selecting a restaurant or buying a musical instrument.  All guitars, for example, are not equal.

When we decide to purchase at a certain quality and price point, we must accept the realities of this transaction.  We should not purchase a Chevy, for example, and expect a Cadillac experience. 

I realize that price and quality may not follow a linear path.  Just because something costs more doesn’t mean it’s better.  There are wrinkles in the marketplace.  Budget hotels, for example, often provide guests with free breakfast free parking and free wifi while high end stodgy hotels gouge guests with resort fees (please explain to me what this is), insane parking charges and crazy minibar prices on top of their exorbitant room rates. 

The task is to match an item’s price and quality with a consumer’s need. 


I Wish Everyone had Cadillac Care

As a physician, I have seen countless examples over the years of folks suffering from limitations in insurance coverage with regard to drug coverage or high deductibles – consequences of cheaper premiums.  (I realize that the medical insurance example is quite complex and very often people either have no choice with regard to their insurance product or simply cannot afford better coverage.)

There is a reason that inexpensive health insurance is inexpensive.  It means your benefits will be limited, your choice of doctors may be restricted, you may need a referral to see a specialist or that you will have to satisfy a high deductible before your coverage kicks in.  These plans work well if you are not planning on getting sick.  However, many events in life including illness can arrive uninvited and unexpectedly 

Health care coverage will be a different entity years from now.  What will the new coverage model look like?  Single payer?  Government controlled?  Free market based?  I predict that health care delivery will become a global phenomenon. Telemedicine already allows patients to consult with physicians in other countries.  Surgeons will be able to operate on patients robotically thousands of miles away, and sooner than we may think.  Health coverage may very well cross international boundaries.  The complexity of this notion is mind boggling and there will be resistance as always occurs when a reform creates winners and losers. Disruption is very disruptive.

Would every individual have equal access to the same level of health care if the industry is globalized?  I doubt it considering how much inequity of opportunity and outcome is built into our own society and the world.  There will be tiers of service and the rich will have access to better health care much as they now enjoy superior legal and financial advice, better leisure activities and more comfortable housing. 

I believe everyone has a right to health care but this does not mean that everyone must receive the same level of care.  Should a person who can afford better health care be prevented from buying it?

 

 

 

Comments

  1. @Tel U, thanks for your thoughtful comment. Personal privacy will be under threat, for sure. How do I know this? Because it already is. Not a week goes by that we are not told of some major breach of our data. Businesses are anxious that they may be the next target of ransomware. Who knows what future forms and capabilities nefarious actors will launch? Technological development will not be restricted to those who aim to make the world better.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...