Skip to main content

How to Read a Chest X-ray

To succeed is to struggle.  Indeed, up to now, an accomplishment was the result of sweat, study, setbacks, discipline, collaboration and hopefully triumph.   Of course, the latter result is never guaranteed which makes this outcome so much more satisfying.  This process of struggling for success is well known to athletes, musicians, scientists, students, writers, chefs, farmers and many others.  All of us go through the same process in more mundane pursuits such as doing a crossword puzzle, learning a new language, testing out a new recipe or reaching a new goal in our exercise routine.

I recall a very small personal struggle I engaged with during my internship and residency days decades ago.  Every patient that physicians-in-training cared for had x-ray studies done.  Checking the results was one of the myriad tasks that fell to interns and medical residents.  Not only was this important medical data, but we wanted to be prepared with the result just in case any of our superiors queried us.  If the senior resident in charge, or worse yet – the attending physician – stopped us in the hall and asked about the x-ray findings, “I didn’t have a chance to check it yet”, was not a good intern look!

There were two ways to obtain x-ray results. 

Show the films to a radiologist who would interpret the findings

Read the film yourself and then assess your reading with the radiologist.

I always pursued the second approach.  I read the film pretending that I was the only one available in the hospital to do so.  When I was scrutinizing a chest x-ray, I committed myself to a radiographic diagnosis.  I made preliminary diagnoses of pneumonia, heart failure, a lung tumor, an enlarged heart or abnormal chest fluid. Oftentimes, I couldn’t detect any abnormality on the film.  Then, I brought the film to a real professional for analysis.  


Hmm,  something doesn't look right here.

Over the first several months of training, I was nearly always wrong, but over time my skills improved.  I struggled over each film and learned from my prior errors.  By the conclusion of my training years, I was reasonably competent at x-ray interpretation.  I  assume that colleagues who habitually brought films directly to an expert for reading did not acquire a similar skill level or confidence.  No struggle, no gain.

Now we are entering the era of artificial intelligence which will transform the medical profession – as well as society  – beyond what we can imagine.  AI will make a traditional internet search engine to seem like an abacus.  We can look forward to levels of performance and quality far beyond human capacity to achieve.  And it will all be dropped at our feet without any necessary struggle.  Will we need writers, actors, artists, professors, therapists and so many others if a machine can deliver the end products to us?  How this feel?   There will still be struggle, however,  We will struggle to find meaning in our lives.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...