Skip to main content

Lessons from the Pandemic - Did We Strike the Right Balance?

We all have taken lessons from the pandemic. There were many things we got right, particularly the development and administration of safe and effective vaccines.  There was also much we got wrong including inaccurate and contradictory information from government agencies and keeping kids out of school long after the data supported a return to in person learning.  And while I am not a public health expert, I still wonder about the wisdom of having imposed restrictions and mitigating measures on all of us rather than focus more narrowly on at risk folks.  I realize that this is a controversial issue as there was the fear that low-risk individuals could transmit the virus to a vulnerable recipient.  The mortality and morbidity in elderly infected people were quite different from that of younger and sturdier individuals.  Public health experts argued that we needed a broad brush to protect more people.

Coronavirus Caused Illness, Death, Anger and Division

Protecting public health should always be a high priority goal but it must be balanced against other considerations.  When we contemplate the educational loss that our kids suffered, the economic catastrophe of failed businesses and the mental health consequences of families who lost jobs or had to stay home to care for kids who were now at home for remote ‘learning’, it’s hard to argue that we drew the line with surgical precision.  And even folks like me – a science and data-driven medical professional – now have a much more wary eye toward government health agencies.  Trust and confidence will need to be rebuilt.  Finally, the political poisoning of what should have remained a health issue not only sacrificed our health, but was also a symptom of a more serious and systemic national malady.  I have seen no evidence since the pandemic has ended that suggests that a treatment for this illness is even under development.  

The widening divisions among us over all issues ranging from the consequential to the trivial is an epidemic that continues to burn. What if the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) could collaborate on devising a treatment for the national affliction of Chronic Polarization Syndrome, it would go a long way in restoring trust in these organizations. 


  1. I concur with your comments about the political divide. And epidemiologists are not finished studying transmission rates. But there is plenty of evidence suggesting that broader shut downs in blue communities did indeed save many lives -- possibly because asymptomatic but infected people in red states without lockdowns transmitted covid to the elderly and immunocompromised. See, e.g., and

  2. I follow your excellent points. Let's both hope that when the next pandemic strikes that our government, politicians, the medical profession and the citizenry demonstrate how much they have learned from the COVID-19 experience. Thx for your comment.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary