Skip to main content

Lessons from the Pandemic - Did We Strike the Right Balance?

We all have taken lessons from the pandemic. There were many things we got right, particularly the development and administration of safe and effective vaccines.  There was also much we got wrong including inaccurate and contradictory information from government agencies and keeping kids out of school long after the data supported a return to in person learning.  And while I am not a public health expert, I still wonder about the wisdom of having imposed restrictions and mitigating measures on all of us rather than focus more narrowly on at risk folks.  I realize that this is a controversial issue as there was the fear that low-risk individuals could transmit the virus to a vulnerable recipient.  The mortality and morbidity in elderly infected people were quite different from that of younger and sturdier individuals.  Public health experts argued that we needed a broad brush to protect more people.

Coronavirus Caused Illness, Death, Anger and Division

Protecting public health should always be a high priority goal but it must be balanced against other considerations.  When we contemplate the educational loss that our kids suffered, the economic catastrophe of failed businesses and the mental health consequences of families who lost jobs or had to stay home to care for kids who were now at home for remote ‘learning’, it’s hard to argue that we drew the line with surgical precision.  And even folks like me – a science and data-driven medical professional – now have a much more wary eye toward government health agencies.  Trust and confidence will need to be rebuilt.  Finally, the political poisoning of what should have remained a health issue not only sacrificed our health, but was also a symptom of a more serious and systemic national malady.  I have seen no evidence since the pandemic has ended that suggests that a treatment for this illness is even under development.  

The widening divisions among us over all issues ranging from the consequential to the trivial is an epidemic that continues to burn. What if the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) could collaborate on devising a treatment for the national affliction of Chronic Polarization Syndrome, it would go a long way in restoring trust in these organizations. 


  1. I concur with your comments about the political divide. And epidemiologists are not finished studying transmission rates. But there is plenty of evidence suggesting that broader shut downs in blue communities did indeed save many lives -- possibly because asymptomatic but infected people in red states without lockdowns transmitted covid to the elderly and immunocompromised. See, e.g., and


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why This Doctor Gave Up Telemedicine

During the pandemic, I engaged in telemedicine with my patients out of necessity.  This platform was already destined to become part of the medical landscape even prior to the pandemic.  COVID-19 accelerated the process.  The appeal is obvious.  Patients can have medical visits from their own homes without driving to the office, parking, checking in, finding their way to the office, biding time in the waiting room and then driving out afterwards.  And patients could consult physicians from far distances, even across state lines.  Most of the time invested in traditional office visits occurs before and after the actual visits.  So much time wasted! Indeed, telemedicine has answered the prayers of time management enthusiasts. At first, I was also intoxicated treating patients via cyberspace, or telemedically, if I may invent a term.   I could comfortably sink into my own couch in sweatpants as I guided patients through the heartbreak of hemorrhoids and the distress of diarrhea.   Clear

Am I Spreading Covid-19 Misinformation?

I presume that most of us are hostile to hate speech, misinformation and disinformation.  Politicians and others want social media to be scrubbed of all nefarious postings.  Twitter is most recently in the crosshairs on this issue after Elon Musk assumed ownership of the company.  They still haven’t settled on a moderation policy.  Social media and other information sources have been accused of radicalizing Americans, fostering hate, undermining our elections, providing a forum for bullies and predators, promoting division and coarsening our national discourse.  One man’s cleansing of disinformation is another man’s censorship. There is some speech that all reasonable people would agree should be banned, such as incitement to violence or prurient matter that children can access.   I challenge those who advocate against publishing hate speech, misinformation or disinformation to offer precise definitions of these categories.   Trust me, this is no easy endeavor.     And if you are

Whistleblower Grand Rounds Vol. 6 No. 22: It’s ‘Alimentary’, Doctors!

It’s been a while since I’ve attended a conventional medical Grand Rounds. These were events where a medical luminary would fly in to give a medical audience a state-of-the-art presentation on a medical subject. Ideally, the speaker was a thought leader and a researcher on the issue. These presentations were usually not a demonstration of the virtue of humility. We physicians, as a class, have generous egos. Academic physicians occupy a higher rung on the ego ladder. Medical Grand Rounders (MGRs), who are on the GR speaking circuit, often must bring their own ladders to assure they will be able to reach their desired atmospheric height. Jacob’s Ladder Photo Credit At least in the old days, before the GR speaker would assume his position behind the rostrum, a designated pre-speaker would offer an introduction. The audience would hear a list of awards, achievements, journal editorial positions, department chairmanships, honorary degrees, publications and book chapter authorships,