What is Your Doctor's Medical Philosophy?

I have been a conservative medical practitioner since my training days decades ago. As readers of this blog have read (?endured) repeatedly, I am very hostile to over-diagnosis and overtreatment. While I don’t have data, my strong sense is that I order fewer scans, offer fewer prescriptions and order fewer lab studies than my peers. I am not suggesting that my approach is the optimal pathway to medical quality, only that it has always defined my medical comfort zone. My philosophy can be summarized as less is more.

Patients have their own medical philosophies and over time tend to link up with medical professionals who share their approach. Some patients laud physicians who test them liberally regarding these doctors to be very thorough and conscientious. “My doctor is so thorough, on my first visit he ordered blood work, a CAT scan and is sending me to 2 specialists!” Patients who prefer a more measured and conservative approach seek likeminded doctors. When the patient and the doctor are philosophically out of sync, it can be challenging to forge a productive doctor-patient relationship.

Best when the patient and the physician are in harmony.

For example, if a patient has received antibiotics several times in past years for symptoms attributed to diverticulitis, how will he feel when a new doctor is skeptical of this diagnosis and declines to prescribe anything? The conversation is a veritable minefield that can have lasting negative impact on the doctor- patient relationship.

Are you telling me, doctor, that my last doctor has misdiagnosed me these past 10 years?

Every time my diverticulitis flared in the past, my doctor gave me antibiotics right away and I always recovered.

With all respect, doctor, this is my body and I want the antibiotics. If you won’t prescribe them for me, then I’ll find someone who will.

Of course, I see patients every day who may not necessarily embrace my conservative approach with respect to diagnosis and treatment. That’s okay. As with every successful relationship, there is dialogue, open mindedness, mutual respect and compromise. But all of us have boundaries that we will not cross. In a relationship, neither side holds sole authority. The patient’s right to accept or refuse medical advice is a bedrock medical ethical principle. But the physician has professional and ethical responsibilities not to encourage or facilitate futile care that offers no promise of benefit, consumes resources and erodes the integrity of the profession.

If the doctor-patient relationship is sturdy, then the likelihood of your receiving better medical advice and outcomes is increased. Shouldn’t this be the goal?

Comments

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change. I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday. I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend. And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me. It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career. It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves. As some readers know, my current employed position has been a dream job for me. Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally. My partner and I ran the business. Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades. On an on-call night, if I slept through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery. And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good? Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it. While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession. Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves? Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students. I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog