Doctors Performing Unnecessary Medical Procedures

If a patient wants a colonoscopy done, and it’s not medically indicated, should the doctor still do it?

If the physician complies with this request, has he or she committed an ethical breach? Should the medical board or some other disciplinary agency be notified to investigate?

Of course, in a perfect world every medical procedure or prescription would be advised only if it is medically indicated. But the world is not perfect and there are instances when good physicians may deviate from established medical dogma. And, there may be a professional dispute if a medical intervention is indicated or not.

Doctors Performing Unnecessary Medical Procedures

We Inhabit an Imperfect World

Consider these examples and whether you think a disciplinary response is appropriate.

A patient is due for his next screening colonoscopy in 2 years, which would be 10 years since his last exam. He approaches his doctor with anxiety because his coworker was just diagnosed with colon cancer. He asks that a colonoscopy be scheduled now. The doctor agrees.
A patient wants his colonoscopy performed in December, after his deductible has been satisfied, rather than wait until July of the following year when he is officially due for his next exam. The physician accedes to this request.
A referring physician requests that his patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy earlier than advised because he feels that the published guidelines from screening are too relaxed. The gastroenterologist complies.
An elderly patient has some modest bowel concerns. The gastroenterologist does not suspect that these symptoms portend a serious issue. The patient is accompanied by her two children who are firm in their desire that their mother undergoes a colonoscopy to assure that all is well. The patient grudgingly agrees to proceed. The doctor schedules the procedure.

So, should these ‘rogue doctors’ be reined in and disciplined? Or are these simply examples of imperfect practitioners functioning in an imperfect world trying to satisfy imperfect patients? How much flexibility should doctors be afforded? Who draws the line? Can physicians deviate from published medical guidelines?

Comments

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change. I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday. I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend. And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me. It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career. It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves. As some readers know, my current employed position has been a dream job for me. Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally. My partner and I ran the business. Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades. On an on-call night, if I slept through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery. And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system. A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly. It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients. Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message. Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’. I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility. Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed. The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days. Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'. The patient is advise...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog