Doctors Performing Unnecessary Medical Procedures

If a patient wants a colonoscopy done, and it’s not medically indicated, should the doctor still do it?

If the physician complies with this request, has he or she committed an ethical breach? Should the medical board or some other disciplinary agency be notified to investigate?

Of course, in a perfect world every medical procedure or prescription would be advised only if it is medically indicated. But the world is not perfect and there are instances when good physicians may deviate from established medical dogma.

Doctors Performing Unnecessary Medical Procedures

We Inhabit an Imperfect World

Consider these examples and whether you think that a disciplinary response is appropriate.

A patient is due for his next screening colonoscopy in 2 years, which would be 10 years since his last exam. He approaches his doctor with anxiety because his coworker was just diagnosed with colon cancer. He asks that a colonoscopy be scheduled now. The doctor agrees.
A patient wants his colonoscopy performed in December, after his deductible has been satisfied, rather than wait until July of the following year when he is officially due for his next exam. The physician accedes to this request.
A referring patient requests that his patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy earlier than advised because he feels that the published guidelines from screening are too lenient. The gastroenterologist complies.
A frail, elderly patient has some modest bowel concerns. The gastroenterologist does not suspect that these symptoms portend a serious issue. The patient is accompanied by her two children who are firm in their desire that their mother undergoes a colonoscopy to assure that all is well. The patient grudgingly agrees to proceed. The doctor schedules the procedure.

So, should these ‘rogue doctors’ be reined in and disciplined? Or are these simply examples of imperfect practitioners functioning in an imperfect world trying to satisfy imperfect patients? Do you agree that strict medical criteria should not be the sole criteria that physicians use?

Comments

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so. The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals. In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist. Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings. Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape. Private equity (PE) firms have been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight. PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale. While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR). I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary. And it’s not a fair fight. You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine. I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient. You must think I am a magician or a savant. While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago. (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog