Skip to main content

The Overuse of Heartburn Drugs

Image
By

Stomach acid must be Public Enemy #1 for gastroenterologists and primary care physicians.  Why else would more than 10 million Americans swallow proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medicines each day? These medicines are potent stomach acid blockers.  Common examples of these medicines include Prilosec (omeprazole), Nexium (esomeprazole) and Protonix (pantoprazole).  PPI medicines have generated tens of billions of dollars for pharmaceutical companies.  And several of these medicines are available over-the-counter (OTC), which permits the public to self-prescribe for a variety of ailments.

Are ordinary folks selecting these medicines appropriately when they purchase OTC?  I have my doubts particularly since medical professionals often prescribe these agents very liberally going beyond the boundaries of medical evidence.  I have also been culpable of the transgression of PPI mission creep.  Indeed, studies have shown that physicians prescribe these acid blockers for the wrong reason and also maintain patients on them for too long, which may be indefinitely.  I have taken on new patients, for example who have been on these medicines for so long that they cannot even recall their purpose or their efficacy.  Often, these medicines are started during a hospitalization and are continued after discharge and then may be granted eternal life.

These drugs are life-changing for patients with frequent heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease, known as GERD.  They are also extremely effective in treating peptic ulcers.  And they are an important component of treating or even preventing acute internal bleeding in hospitalized patients.  But PPI use, or overuse, has reached far beyond these drugs’ established indications.

Stomach Ulcers Heal with PPI Treatment

Stomach Ulcers Heal with PPI Treatment

Why has this happened?  The phenomena of drug overuse is much less common in hypertension or diabetes, for example.  Here’s the difference.  Abdominal pain, indigestion, upset stomach, abdominal cramps, nausea, and bloating are among the most common symptoms that patients suffer from.  The reality is that at a huge percentage of these individuals will not be found to a have a specific diagnostic explanation, such as an ulcer or gallstones or appendicitis.  Many will be told that their symptoms are ‘functional’ or the effects of irritable bowel syndrome, a stubborn syndrome associated with a variety of chronic intestinal distress.  And modern medicine doesn’t have very effective drugs for these conditions.  Medical professionals, therefore, often prescribe PPIs in these instances hoping to bring patients a measure of relief. 

But is this practice good medicine?  Should well meaning medical professionals like me prescribe drugs outside of the drugs' reach because there are no effective drugs available? What would the medical profession look like if all medicines were prescribed this loosely?

 

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

By
Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...
15 comments
Read more

When Should Doctors Retire?

By
I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...
69 comments
Read more

Personal Responsibility for Health

By
One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...
3 comments
Read more