Skip to main content

The Benefits of a Gluten Free Diet

Is gluten really Public Enemy #1?  Many seem to regard it as a toxic agent that causes a variety of symptoms.  Restaurants and supermarkets offer a wide variety of gluten-free foods.  Years ago, physicians advised a gluten-free diet only for individuals who had celiac disease (CD), which is an autoimmune disease that largely affects the small intestine.  If a celiac patient wades back into gluten territory, then his or her intestine will revolt.  I care for a few of these folks, but they are but a slim fraction of my patients who are shunning gluten.  

Gluten are proteins contained in wheat and other grains.   Many adherents of a gluten-free diet believe that avoiding gluten is a more healthful dietary choice.   There is no actual test to confirm gluten intolerance, but many patients feel better on this diet. . Why should it matter if an individual chooses to avoid gluten?  After all, there’s no risk here?  In fact, avoiding gluten can lead to vitamin deficiencies and increased exposure to arsenic and mercury.  I’m not suggesting that glutenphobes are at risk of poisoning themselves, but they should make sure that they remain nutritionally sound.


Amber Waves of Grain

  
There are 3 conditions with scientific support for avoiding gluten.

Celiac Disease:  Without question, gluten is the enemy

Gluten Intolerance (GI): A murkier condition that likely exists but may be over-diagnosed.  The relationship between gluten and the symptoms attributed to GI, such as abdominal pain, brain fog, bloating, fatigue, headaches and bowel irregularity, is tenuous.   Many other medical conditions beyond gluten exposure might be responsible.  There is no accurate test for GI.

Wheat Allergy:  This is a food allergy.   True food allergies (not intolerances) are very rare, although many patients mistakenly believe they are suffering from them..  Allergic features include hives, wheezing, itching and difficulty breathing. 

Most gluten avoiders do not fall within the above categories.  They avoid gluten because they feel better on the diet or believe that it is serving their health interests.  We all do stuff that we believe benefits us, even if there is no scientific support.  If you feel better avoiding a food item, then of course you should do so.

We are a free country and we have the right to be gluten-free.   But, let’s make sure that we separate fact from myth, or put another way, separate the wheat from the chaff.


Comments

  1. I feel better eating less gluten. I think our American diet is too high in gluten but is somewhat hard to cut back and maintain ( for me)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...