Skip to main content

Is There a Safe Blood Thinner?

For those who can’t stand the sight of blood, I would advise against pursuing a career in gastroenterology.  We confront blood more often and more directly than nearly every other medical practitioner.  One of the most common reasons we are called to see hospitalized patients is to evaluate internal bleeding that originates somewhere within the alimentary canal.  It is then our task to identify the exact site of leakage and to caulk the leak, if possible. 

As even a casual TV watcher knows that blood thinning medications are ubiquitous.   In the olden days, there was Coumadin (aka warfarin), which is still in use today.  It is a rather clumsy drug that requires frequent monitoring and dosage adjustments.  At times, and for no apparent reason, a Coumadin user’s blood will become thinner than desired and internal bleeding may result.  More recently, new generations of blood thinners have emerged giving physicians many new ways to thin their patients’ blood.  These newer agents are expensive, but no dosage monitoring is necessary.

As you might expect, many of the internal bleeding patients we confront are also on a blood thinning agent which adds to the seriousness and complexity of these cases.   If, for example, an individual develops a bleeding ulcer, imagine the potential consequences of this event if a blood thinning agent has stifled his clotting capability.   And, most patients who are taking a blood thinner are likely to have many other medical issues, which increases the risk of an unfavorable outcome.   


A Stomach Ulcer. 

 If this patient were on a blood thinner, this scene might be a bloody mess.


The ideal blood thinner would thin the blood enough to achieve the desired outcome, but not enough to precipitate internal bleeding.  The pharmaceutical companies have not been able to devise such a finely tuned drug yet.   Blood thinners save lives, but they can be bloody dangerous.

For many individuals, blood thinning agents are lifesaving.  But, they have significant risks that need to be soberly weighed.  A few days before writing this, I saw an 86-year-old frail female whose cardiologist wanted her to restart a blood thinning agent because she had an irregular heart rate and this would reduce her risk of a stroke.  The patient was reluctant because some months ago, she fell and sustained a head injury with bleeding.   What advice would you have given her?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...